2016
DOI: 10.1007/s11269-016-1467-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Forest Thinning on Water Yield in a Sub-Humid Mediterranean Oak-Beech Mixed Forested Watershed

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Log transformation of the runoff data was deemed necessary after assessing the normality of the data and assessing the goodness of fit with a Shapiro–Wilk w test using PROC UNIVARIATE (Bowley, 2008). To determine the effect of a change in agricultural management (from a conventional wheat–fallow rotation to a no‐till wheat–fallow and subsequently wheat–lentil/pea rotation, and to an organic wheat–green manure rotation) on snowmelt water yield, we compared predicted runoff from the relationship established prior to the change in management with the observed runoff post‐change in management, in accordance with the methodology of Gökbulak et al (2016) and Yurtseven et al (2017). We established linear regression relationships for the log‐transformed runoff volume from snowmelt episodes for Plot 1 and 2 against the control Plot 3, prior to the change in management in 1993.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Log transformation of the runoff data was deemed necessary after assessing the normality of the data and assessing the goodness of fit with a Shapiro–Wilk w test using PROC UNIVARIATE (Bowley, 2008). To determine the effect of a change in agricultural management (from a conventional wheat–fallow rotation to a no‐till wheat–fallow and subsequently wheat–lentil/pea rotation, and to an organic wheat–green manure rotation) on snowmelt water yield, we compared predicted runoff from the relationship established prior to the change in management with the observed runoff post‐change in management, in accordance with the methodology of Gökbulak et al (2016) and Yurtseven et al (2017). We established linear regression relationships for the log‐transformed runoff volume from snowmelt episodes for Plot 1 and 2 against the control Plot 3, prior to the change in management in 1993.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The paired watershed approach is an acceptable methodology to test the effect of timber harvest on the water yield and streamflow chemistry while eliminating extraneous effects resulting from variabilities in the biotic and abiotic factors in the treatment sites. The paired watershed method works on two or more watersheds located adjacent to or near each other with similar characteristics in terms of size, slope, aspect, soil, topography, climate, and vegetation (land cover) (Clausen & Spooner, 1993; Gökbulak et al, 2016). The great advantage of the paired watershed approach is to measure the effects of forestry activities on watershed hydrology on small scales and interpolate its results to large scales.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies were conducted about forestry practices and their effect on watershed hydrology in the last couple of decades in the Belgrad Forest (Serengil et al 2007a, Serengil et al 2007b, Gokbulak et al 2016, Yurtseven et al 2017, Erdogan et al 2018, the response of soil moisture and soil temperature to vegetation change from forest to herbaceous vegetation (Ozkan & Gokbulak 2017), effects of forest canopy cover on water chemical quality (Eisalou et al 2013) and calculation of evapotranspiration with catchment water balance equation (Ozhan et al 2010). Ozhan (1982) reported that 28.3% of the precipitation returns to the atmosphere via interception in pine stands and 15.6% in oak stands in the Belgrad Forest.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%