Effect of Four Different Rootstocks on the Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of 'Valor' Plum Trees

Sitarek, M.; Grzyb, Z.S.; Koziński, B.

doi:10.17660/actahortic.2007.734.62

Cited by 9 publications

(5 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The differences in plum acid content significantly varied between cultivars and years, but differences between rootstocks were insignificant. These results are similar with other results obtained by Sitarek et al in 2007 andMilošević andMilošević in 2012. The highest acid content was obtained in 2020 (0.75% malic acid, 0.72% citric acid and 0.80% tartaric acid) and lowest in 2018 (0.37% malic acid, 0.35% citric acid and 0.41% tartaric acid) (Table 2).…”

Section: Current Trends In Natural Sciencessupporting

confidence: 91%

“…It is known that plum quality depend on the cultivar (genetic), environmental conditions, harvest date, orchard management (Nergiz and Yildiz, 1997;Usenik et al, 2008;Milošević and Milošević, 2012), and on the rootstocks. In general, the rootstock influences the growth, yield (Botu et al, 2002;Hrotko et al, 2002;Sosna, 2002;Rubauskis et al, 2003;Lanauskas, 2006;Sitarek et al, 2007;Vangdal et al, 2007;Butac et al, 2016), but also the fruit size and fruit quality Daza et al, 2008;Rato et al, 2008;Milošević and Milošević, 2012;Radovic et al, 2020).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Influence of Rootstocks on the Physical and Chemical Characteristics of the Fruits at Some Plum Cultivars

Zamfirescu¹,

Hoza²,

Butac³

et al. 2021

CTNS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This paper investigated physical and chemical characteristics of five cultivars (‘Andreea’, ‘Piteștean’, ‘Romanța’, ‘Čačanska Lepotiča’ and ‘Jojo’) influenced by seven rootstocks (‘Mirobolan dwarf’, ‘Mirodad 1’, ‘Mirodad 2’, ‘Adaptabil’, ‘Redutabil’, ‘BN4Kr’ and ’B83-8’. The trees were planted in 2015 at 4 x 3 m and comprised 3 trees / 3 replications. Physical (weight, colour and firmness) and chemical attributes (soluble solids, acid content and pH) were evaluated and calculated. The influence of rootstocks on the fruit’s quality was very variable due to complex interactions: rootstock x cultivar, rootstock x year, cultivar x rootstock, cultivar x year. As results of the investigations, we found that some traits such as fruit weight, firmness, soluble solids and acid content of fruits have been influenced by rootstocks. ‘Adaptabil’ and ‘Mirodad 1’ rootstocks had a positive effect on some fruit attributes of all plum cultivars studied and can be recommended for extended in commercial orchards.

show abstract

Section: Current Trends In Natural Sciencessupporting

confidence: 91%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Rootstocks on the Physical and Chemical Characteristics of the Fruits at Some Plum Cultivars

Zamfirescu¹,

Hoza²,

Butac³

et al. 2021

CTNS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…has been the most broadly used rootstock in plum orchards in the region for a long period. However, this rootstock does not correspond to the demands of commercial horticulture -it produces trees of vigorous growth (Rozpara, Glowacka, 2010;Sitarek, Grzyb et al, 2007). Also, it is not suitable for hobby gardeners if gardens are located in wet soils and if there is incompatibility between rootstock and cultivar observed (Lepsis, Drudze et al 2004).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of Plum Rootstocks on the Content of Reducing Sugars in the Annual Shoots of Cultivar ‘Kubanskaya Kometa’

Dēķena¹,

Jänes

Alsiņa

2014

Proceedings of the Latvia University of Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The most frequently used rootstock in Czech Republic is still the myrobalan seedling. With the increased need for intensification of fruit production, several rootstock trials have already been established and evaluated in central Europe (Hrotkó et al 1998;Kosina 1998Kosina , 2007Sosna 2002;Sitarek et al 2007) in order to find more productive scion-rootstock combinations. Authors in these publications presented results of the influence of new rootstocks, described by Hrotkó et al (1998), Jakob (1992, Hartmann (1995), and Webster (1997), on selected plum cultivars, nevertheless most of them are results from young orchards, which just enter the productive stage.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Long-term evaluation of growth and yield of Stanley and Cacanska lepotica plum cultivars on selected rootstocks

et al. 2015

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Mészáros M., Kosina J., LaňarL., Náměstek J. (2015): Long-term evaluation of growth and yield of Stanley and Cacanska lepotica plum cultivars on selected rootstocks. Hort. Sci. (Prague), 42: 22-28.During 1992-2012, trunk cross-section area (TCSA), cumulative yield, yield efficiency and suckering of plum cultivars Stanley and Cacanska lepotica in combinations with vegetative rootstocks Myrobalan SE 4043, Myrobalan SE 4044, MY-KL-A, GF 655/2, GF 43, Damas C SE 4045, Pixy, St. Julien A and generative rootstock Myrobalan seedling were evaluated. The results indicated significant differencies of the characteristics between the evaluated cultivar/rootstock combinations for each cultivar. The long-term experience indicates that the evaluated characteristics of the trees on different rootstocks can significantly change during the ontogenetical developement in the orchard. This is demonstrated by the difference in the entering into the bearing stage, different abudance of the yields, the time of reaching of maximum yields and also in changes of growth intensity. For detailed description of the rootstock characteristics long-term trials are required. For cv. Stanley, Myrobalan SE 4043 is the best rootstock for long-term orchards and St. Julien A for orchards with a higher replanting rate. For cv. Cacanska lepotica, Myrobalan SE 4043 seems to be the best rootstock.Keywords: ontogenesis; stage; productivity; TCSA; bearing; suckering Plum is one of the traditional fruit crops grown in the Czech Republic. For good performance in the orchards, the rootstock has an important influence on the scion cultivar. The most frequently used rootstock in Czech Republic is still the myrobalan seedling. With the increased need for intensification of fruit production, several rootstock trials have already been established and evaluated in central Europe (Hrotkó et al. 1998;Kosina 1998Kosina , 2007Sosna 2002;Sitarek et al. 2007) in order to find more productive scion-rootstock combinations. Authors in these publications presented results of the influence of new rootstocks, described by Hrotkó et al. (1998), Jakob (1992, Hartmann (1995), andWebster (1997), on selected plum cultivars, nevertheless most of them are results from young orchards, which just enter the productive stage. It is interesting to supplement this information with long-term results.Experience from international rootstock trials shows that the performance of a rootstock in combination with the cultivar may change in different agroclimatic conditions (Hartmann et al. 2007). That is the main reason to test the same rootstocks in different regions of Europe and of the world. However, the question is, if the rootstock with the cultivar retains qualities in growth and bearing throughout the ontogeny

show abstract

Effect of Four Different Rootstocks on the Growth, Yield and Fruit Quality of 'Valor' Plum Trees

Cited by 9 publications

References 0 publications

Influence of Rootstocks on the Physical and Chemical Characteristics of the Fruits at Some Plum Cultivars

Influence of Rootstocks on the Physical and Chemical Characteristics of the Fruits at Some Plum Cultivars

Influence of Plum Rootstocks on the Content of Reducing Sugars in the Annual Shoots of Cultivar ‘Kubanskaya Kometa’

Long-term evaluation of growth and yield of Stanley and Cacanska lepotica plum cultivars on selected rootstocks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About