2004
DOI: 10.1249/01.mss.0000128180.51443.83
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Gender and Defensive Opponent on the Biomechanics of Sidestep Cutting

Abstract: A simulated defense player causes increased lower limb movements and forces, and should be a useful addition to laboratory protocols for sidestepping. Gender differences in the joint kinematics suggest that increased knee valgus may contribute to ACL injury risk in women, and that the hip and ankle may play an important role in controlling knee valgus during sidestepping. Consideration of the entire lower extremity contributes to an understanding of injury mechanisms and may lead to better training programs fo… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
299
4
7

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 358 publications
(324 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
14
299
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Specifically, all simulated variables fell within the pre-defined criteria of two standard deviations from the measured data. The lower limb joint kinematics quantified during sidestep cutting for each subject were also consistent with those reported previously (Colby et al, 2000;McLean et al, 1999McLean et al, , 2004aNeptune et al, 1999). Based on these results, optimized models RMS fit error corresponds to the average difference in terms of SD�s between simulated and measured data.…”
Section: Model Validitysupporting
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Specifically, all simulated variables fell within the pre-defined criteria of two standard deviations from the measured data. The lower limb joint kinematics quantified during sidestep cutting for each subject were also consistent with those reported previously (Colby et al, 2000;McLean et al, 1999McLean et al, , 2004aNeptune et al, 1999). Based on these results, optimized models RMS fit error corresponds to the average difference in terms of SD�s between simulated and measured data.…”
Section: Model Validitysupporting
confidence: 86%
“…However, the above differences are consistent with those observed previously for gender comparisons of lower limb joint kinematics during sidestep cutting (Malinzak et al, 2001;McLean et al, 2004a,b) and jump landing (Ford et al, 2003) tasks. Such differences are suggested to stem from concomitant gender-based differences in lower limb anatomy (McLean et al, 1999) and NMC during movement execution (Boden et al, 2000;Griffin et al, 2000;McLean et al, 2004a). These assertions appear substantiated considering that in the current case, lower limb alignment and initial con tact (NMC) conditions for each model were subject spe cific.…”
Section: External Knee Loads For Optimized Simulationssupporting
confidence: 62%
See 3 more Smart Citations