2015
DOI: 10.1002/app.42624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of graphene oxide on the behavior of poly(amide‐6‐b‐ethylene oxide)/graphene oxide mixed‐matrix membranes in the permeation process

Abstract: Polyether-block-amide (Pebax)/graphene oxide (GO) mixed-matrix membranes (MMMs) were prepared with a solution casting method, and their gas-separation performance and mechanical properties were investigated. Compared with the pristine Pebax membrane, the crystallinity of the Pebax/GO MMMs showed a little increase. The incorporation of GO induced an increase in the elastic modulus, whereas the strain at break and tensile strength decreased. The apparent activation energies (E p ) of CO 2 , N 2 , H 2 , and CH 4 … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
32
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 77 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
5
32
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar surface morphology was observed after incorporating GO into polyether block amide (Pebax) matrix using cast coating method [43]. In terms of the cross-sectional images ( Figure S4), they showed good agreement with the surface SEM images.…”
Section: Characterizationssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…Similar surface morphology was observed after incorporating GO into polyether block amide (Pebax) matrix using cast coating method [43]. In terms of the cross-sectional images ( Figure S4), they showed good agreement with the surface SEM images.…”
Section: Characterizationssupporting
confidence: 73%
“…For comparison purposes, the gas separation performance of the Pebax‐1657 based membranes reported by other researchers is listed in Table S1 . It was observed that the CO 2 /gas selectivity and CO 2 permeability of Pebax‐MWCNT@GONRs‐1 in this work were higher than those of most Pebax‐1657 based membranes reported.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Other fillers that were used in the MMMs as fillers are silica, activated carbon, metal nanoparticles, graphene, carbon nanotubes, porous polymers, covalent organic frameworks, etc. [19][20][21][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] The microporous materials show very high selectivity owing to their molecular sieving capability. Another factor that affects the properties are their surface functionality which improves adsorption of the gases on their surfaces which in turn results in improved molecular diffusion through its pores.…”
Section: Polymer-filler Compatibilitymentioning
confidence: 99%