2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.ghir.2015.12.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of growth hormone treatment on diastolic function in patients who have developed growth hormone deficiency after definitive treatment of acromegaly

Abstract: Objective Although growth hormone (GH) replacement is prescribed for patients with hypopituitarism due to many etiologies, it is not routinely prescribed for patients with GH deficiency (GHD) after cure of acromegaly (acroGHD). This study was designed to investigate the effect of GH replacement on cardiac parameters in acroGHD. Design We prospectively evaluated for 12 months 23 patients with acroGHD: 15 subjects on GH replacement and eight subjects not on GH replacement. Main outcome measures included LV mas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Biventricular hypertrophy is characteristic for acromegaly [ 12 ]. We did not find difference in the size of the left and right ventricles between acromegaly patients and controls, which is in agreement with other studies [ 17 19 ]. The results indicate that there is no difference in LV size, RV size, and RV free-wall thickness between AP and controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Biventricular hypertrophy is characteristic for acromegaly [ 12 ]. We did not find difference in the size of the left and right ventricles between acromegaly patients and controls, which is in agreement with other studies [ 17 19 ]. The results indicate that there is no difference in LV size, RV size, and RV free-wall thickness between AP and controls.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…They conducted a study on 23 patients with pituitary insufficiency regarding GH secretion. After 12 months of treatment, there were no differences in echocardiographic parameters between the groups (15 treated patients and 9 untreated patients) [ 25 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%