2021
DOI: 10.1039/d0tc04760k
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of H2S pre-annealing treatment on interfacial and electrical properties of HfO2/Si1−xGex (x = 0–0.3)

Abstract: To understand the effect of H2S pre-annealing treatment on a Si1−xGex alloy film, the interfacial and electrical characteristics of atomic-layer-deposited HfO2/Si1−xGex were studied while varying the Ge concentration (x value) from 0 to 0.3.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

2
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7,10 Figure 3 compares the D it values at the trap energy level of 0.4 eV above the valence band edge, which was extracted using a conductance method with a procedure identical to that employed in previous studies. 8,25 Regardless of the interfacial pretreatment methods, the D it values increase by more than 1 or 2 orders of magnitude with increasing Ge concentration of the substrate, which is owing to the increased formation of undesired GeO x at the HfO 2 /Si 1−x Ge x interface. As expected from the C−V curves in Figure 1, both the YT1 (w/H 2 O) and YT2 (w/o H 2 O) pretreatments effectively reduce the D it values for the Si 0.85 Ge 0.15 and Si 0.7 Ge 0.3 samples, demonstrating that the two pretreatments are effective in restraining the formation of Ge dangling bonds, similar to the results of a previous study that used a pure Ge substrate.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…7,10 Figure 3 compares the D it values at the trap energy level of 0.4 eV above the valence band edge, which was extracted using a conductance method with a procedure identical to that employed in previous studies. 8,25 Regardless of the interfacial pretreatment methods, the D it values increase by more than 1 or 2 orders of magnitude with increasing Ge concentration of the substrate, which is owing to the increased formation of undesired GeO x at the HfO 2 /Si 1−x Ge x interface. As expected from the C−V curves in Figure 1, both the YT1 (w/H 2 O) and YT2 (w/o H 2 O) pretreatments effectively reduce the D it values for the Si 0.85 Ge 0.15 and Si 0.7 Ge 0.3 samples, demonstrating that the two pretreatments are effective in restraining the formation of Ge dangling bonds, similar to the results of a previous study that used a pure Ge substrate.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As observed in Figure , an increase in the Ge concentration of the Si 1– x Ge x substrates causes a large frequency dispersion of the C – V curves due to the high density of interface states located near the lower half of the Si 1– x Ge x band gap. These interface states are closely associated with the Ge dangling bonds formed by the thermodynamically unstable GeO x at the interfacial region. , Figure compares the D it values at the trap energy level of 0.4 eV above the valence band edge, which was extracted using a conductance method with a procedure identical to that employed in previous studies. , Regardless of the interfacial pretreatment methods, the D it values increase by more than 1 or 2 orders of magnitude with increasing Ge concentration of the substrate, which is owing to the increased formation of undesired GeO x at the HfO 2 /Si 1– x Ge x interface. As expected from the C – V curves in Figure , both the YT1 (w/H 2 O) and YT2 (w/o H 2 O) pretreatments effectively reduce the D it values for the Si 0.85 Ge 0.15 and Si 0.7 Ge 0.3 samples, demonstrating that the two pretreatments are effective in restraining the formation of Ge dangling bonds, similar to the results of a previous study that used a pure Ge substrate .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation