2000
DOI: 10.2331/suisan.66.439
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Hang-in Ratio on Size-Selectivity of Gillnet.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
3
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 Sulaeman et al conducted a gill net fishing experiment for carp and rainbow trout and reported that hanging ratios did not affect the wedged-catch selectivity although it may change the catch efficiency. 29 These reports support the results of the present study. In addition, a forced Relationship between the mesh size and the optimum fork length, and the retention length with 5% and 50% relative efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 Sulaeman et al conducted a gill net fishing experiment for carp and rainbow trout and reported that hanging ratios did not affect the wedged-catch selectivity although it may change the catch efficiency. 29 These reports support the results of the present study. In addition, a forced Relationship between the mesh size and the optimum fork length, and the retention length with 5% and 50% relative efficiency.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Sulaeman et al . conducted a gill net fishing experiment for carp and rainbow trout and reported that hanging ratios did not affect the wedged‐catch selectivity although it may change the catch efficiency 29 . These reports support the results of the present study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Future investigations of size selectivity might take into consideration a larger number of mesh sizes and analyse the influence of other factors such as: (i) hanging ratio (Sulaeman et al., ; Gray et al., ; Ayaz et al., ), (ii) eventual changes in the maximum girth‐length relationship produced by morphological changes due to their reproductive activity (Ehrhardt and Die, ; Holst et al., ), and (iii) demographic composition of the species due to temporal and spatial changes (San Martín et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In gill net construction, the shortening value required for entangled fish is 30%-40%, while the shortening value of 35%-60% is required for catching fish by spinning [21] . Accurate use of shortening value in gill net construction will be able to increase the number of fish caught [52,53] . The results of calculating the shortening value of Tilapia nets, the shortening value obtained for mesh size 2.5 inches is 52.28%-58.56%, mesh size 3 inches is 60.23%-65.46%, and mesh size 3.5 inches is 65.91%-70.40%.…”
Section: Characteristics Form Of Tilapia Netmentioning
confidence: 99%