2018
DOI: 10.1002/mrm.27339
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of head motion on MRI B0 field distribution

Abstract: The B field changes arising from head motion are problematic for multishot T2*-weighted imaging. Characterization of the underlying sources provides new insights into mitigation strategies, which may benefit from individualized predictive field models in addition to real-time field monitoring and correction strategies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
59
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(62 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
(76 reference statements)
3
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The field perturbations contained both slow‐drift and faster oscillatory patterns, which have been previously observed as well . The oscillatory contributions can be clearly attributed to the breathing cycle; the slower contributions could have diverse origins, including other physiological and metabolic sources, but may have been strongly driven by drifts in head position/orientation, as these have been found to generate important perturbations in the measured field at a similar order of magnitude . From these perturbations resulted diverse image artifacts (eg, Figure B), also consistent with previous reports .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…The field perturbations contained both slow‐drift and faster oscillatory patterns, which have been previously observed as well . The oscillatory contributions can be clearly attributed to the breathing cycle; the slower contributions could have diverse origins, including other physiological and metabolic sources, but may have been strongly driven by drifts in head position/orientation, as these have been found to generate important perturbations in the measured field at a similar order of magnitude . From these perturbations resulted diverse image artifacts (eg, Figure B), also consistent with previous reports .…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…At low saturation powers (<1 μT), the CrCESTw peak was sharper (Figure E) but not consistent between the contralateral regions. This is because the sharp CEST line‐shapes obtained with lower saturation powers not only are prone to the B 0 field inhomogeneity, but also can be easily disturbed by the B 0 fluctuation caused by animal respiration, motion and heating of the MRI shimming unit, which will lead to larger standard deviation as shown in Figure E. The above‐mentioned issue can be addressed by applying a higher saturation power, as shown in Figure F.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite anesthesia, the influence of motion on the phase turned out to be high in some regions. 7 As a result, reliable estimate of small temperature rises everywhere in the brain was rendered difficult. Based on simulation, the strategy used here was to focus on a sagittal slice to possibly observe a temperature hotspot as measured in phantom studies with the same coil 20 and attempt detecting a horizontal temperature plateau in a zone relatively robust to head motion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%