Effect of heat inactivation for the detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome-corona virus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) with reverse transcription real time polymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR): evidence from Ethiopian study

Abstract

Background Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been a major public health importance and its specimen needs to be handled safely due to concerns of potential transmissibility to health care workers. Heat inactivation of the sample before nucleic acid isolation might permit safe testing processes. Hence, it is important to assess the effect of heat inactivation on SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR detection in resource limited settings. Methods An experimental study was conducted at Ethiopian Public Health Institute (EPHI) from September 25 to October 15, 2020. A total of 188 Oro-pharyngeal swabs were collected from COVID-19 suspected cases, referred to EPHI for SARS COV-2 testing. One batch of the sample was inactivated at 56 °C heat for 30 min, and the other batch was stored at 4 °C for a similar period of time. RNA extraction and detection were done by DAAN Gene kit protocols. Abbott m2000 RT-PCR was used for amplification and detection. Data analysis was done by using SPSS version 23.0; Chi-square and Pearson correlation test for qualitative and semi-quantitative analysis were used. p-value < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results Out of 188 total samples, 119 (63.3%) were positive and 69 (36.7%) were negative in the non-inactivated group. While, 115 (61.2%) of samples were positive and 73 (38.8) were negative in heat inactivated sample batch. Rate of positivity between groups did not have statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). The mean Cycle threshold (Ct) value difference between the two groups of ORF1a/b gene and N gene was 0.042 (95% CI − 0.247–0.331; t = 0.28; p = 0.774) and 0.38 (95% CI 0.097–0.682; t = 2.638; p = 0.010) respectively. Conclusion Heat inactivation at 56 °C for 30 min did not affect the qualitative rRT-PCR detection of SARS-CoV-2. However, the finding showed that there was statistically significant Ct value increment after heat inactivation compared to untreated samples. Therefore, false-negative results for high Ct value (Ct > 35) samples were found to be the challenge of this protocol. Hence alternative inactivation methods should be investigated and further studies should be considered.

The Comparison of Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing with Conventional Microbiological Tests for Identification of Pathogens and Antibiotic Resistance Genes in Infectious Diseases

“…Since the collected samples were suspected to be infectious, they were inactivated by 56°C water bath for 30 minutes before nucleic acid extraction. [11][12][13] Different types of samples underwent different pretreatment. For nucleic acid extraction, blood samples were centrifuged at 1600 g for 10 minutes at 4°C to separate plasma.…”

Scalable RT‐LAMP‐based SARS‐CoV‐2 testing for infection surveillance with applications in pandemic preparedness

“…For one individual, we observed four samples with a low viral load (Ct > 30) tested negative in the LAMP assay after four days of storage at RT. For the sake of safety and convenience, a heat inactivation step (5 min at 85–90°C) was included in the sample processing procedure (Woldesemayat et al , 2022 ). We observed that the heat inactivation step and subsequent storage of the samples at 4°C (for later validation of positive RT‐LAMP results) did not negatively influence the detection of the virus (Fig 1D (ii; iii)).…”

Short-term prognostic analysis of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus co-infection and comparison of mNGS and conventional microbiological test results

“…BALF, cerebrospinal fluid, pus and lung tissue need to be cryopreserved in dry sterile tubes. After proper storage and transport, samples were inactivated in a 56°C water bath for 30 minutes prior to nucleic acid extraction to reduce sample infectivity ( Kampf et al., 2020 ; Pastorino et al., 2020 ; Woldesemayat et al., 2022 ). DNA was extracted by TIANamp Micro DNA kit after different pretreatments for different types of samples according to the manufacturer’s instructions.…”