The clinical demand of orthopedic implants has raised tremendously over the past couple of decades with increasing population needing surgeries each year, making it a staple of medical industry. [1,2] Orthopedic implants are mostly used for structural reinforcement and are inserted inside body either temporarily or permanently. Temporary implants such as screws and plates are primarily employed for fracture fixation and removed after few months, whereas permanent implants are designed to replace damaged body parts such as hip, knee, ankle, shoulder, or elbow and are expected to stay within the patient throughout the lifespan. [3,4] Fractures of metacarpals and phalanges are common and in many cases treated nonoperatively if the fracture is stable. [5] Unstable fractures are operatively treated using internal fixation methods with Kirschner wires (K-wires), pins, screws plates, or a combination. [6] K-wire fixation creates a biomechanical environment that is stable enough to allow early postoperative mobilization mostly for proximal third and metacarpal neck fractures and is generally associated with better aesthetic outcome than open reduction internal fixation. [6,7] Plate and screw fixation are considered an ideal option to treat difficult fractures as it provides absolute construct rigidity compared to other methods of fracture fixation. [7] The design of medical implants should be very specific to the fractured or damaged bone, especially in plate and screw scenarios, where strategic pores are utilized to promote bone healing in the correct orientation to last for a long time. However, in most cases, standardized implants are bought directly from the manufacturer and modifications are made during surgery by bending, twisting, or trimming the implants to conform to the patient's bone, with verification from the surgeon's judgment. [4] Manufacturing defect arising from the fabrication process and lack of proper quality control impacts the overall mechanical properties of the implants. Changing critical parameters such as shape, diameter, and length affects the stress distribution in complicated loading scenarios. This highlights the importance of introducing engineered implant to suit specific bone fractures to reduce the likelihood of implant failures. [8][9][10][11][12][13] Moreover, traditional methods such as die casting and post-processing computer numerical control milling are expensive processes that require specialized equipment and lead times to manufacture and transport, and hence seldom utilized for patient-specific needs. Unlike traditional manufacturing methods, additive manufacturing (AM) uses a layer-by-layer manufacturing technique allowing fabrication of complex geometries with various materials in a cheaper