2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.amc.2015.08.057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of heterogeneous sub-populations on the evolution of cooperation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Heterogeneity has been investigated to promote cooperation in the recent literature [21][22][23][24]. Heterogeneous networks are more conducive to cooperative behaviour than homogeneous networks [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Heterogeneity has been investigated to promote cooperation in the recent literature [21][22][23][24]. Heterogeneous networks are more conducive to cooperative behaviour than homogeneous networks [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a mathematical tool, game theory mainly focuses on the competitive and cooperative relationship of the participants, and it has been widely applied in the field of cooperation. Typical examples of evolutionary games include repeated prisoners' dilemma and snowdrift games [5][6][7]. In [8], Shen et al compare different methods of games and regard the evolutionary game as a good method to solve the problem of node cooperation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, exploring the extensive cooperation behaviors becomes an open challenge and attract the attentions of scientific researchers in a myriad of fields including physics, mathematics, biology and behavioral science678910. In addition to being a good tool for the decision problem11121314, evolutionary game theory has been generally accepted as the common framework to tackle the issue. In particular, the prisoner’s dilemma game (PDG), the snowdrift game (SDG) and the stag-hunt game (SHG) are often employed as the metaphors for the social dilemmas15161718192021.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%