2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymer.2017.04.046
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of homopolymer in polymerization-induced microphase separation process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

6
26
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
6
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure a, a monolith prepared using 20 kg mol –1 PEO-CTA (PEO-CTA:S/DVB = 8:17) and no hPEO (hPEO:PEO-CTA = 0) shows a single broad SAXS reflection centered at a scattering wavevector q ≈ 0.3 nm –1 , indicating a microphase-separated but disordered structure with compositional heterogeneity on an ∼20 nm length scale. This result is similar to the nanostructured monoliths that our previous studies achieved, although here a difunctional instead of monofunctional PEO-CTA was employed. We have reported that PEO or PLA homopolymer selectively swells the microphase-separated PLA domain in PLA- b -P­(S- co -DVB) monoliths. When the homopolymer additive exceeds the solubility limit in the PLA domain by increasing either the molar mass or mass fraction of the additive, macrophase separation of the homopolymer occurs, resulting in macropores.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…In Figure a, a monolith prepared using 20 kg mol –1 PEO-CTA (PEO-CTA:S/DVB = 8:17) and no hPEO (hPEO:PEO-CTA = 0) shows a single broad SAXS reflection centered at a scattering wavevector q ≈ 0.3 nm –1 , indicating a microphase-separated but disordered structure with compositional heterogeneity on an ∼20 nm length scale. This result is similar to the nanostructured monoliths that our previous studies achieved, although here a difunctional instead of monofunctional PEO-CTA was employed. We have reported that PEO or PLA homopolymer selectively swells the microphase-separated PLA domain in PLA- b -P­(S- co -DVB) monoliths. When the homopolymer additive exceeds the solubility limit in the PLA domain by increasing either the molar mass or mass fraction of the additive, macrophase separation of the homopolymer occurs, resulting in macropores.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 85%
“…At r macroCTA value of 0.25 the 3D printed rectangular prism showed slightly increased transmittance, while the samples with r macroCTA > 0.50 showed high transparency (Figure 4B). These observations are consistent with previous work reported for cross-linked monoliths prepared by bulk RAFT polymerization, [55] and are explained by changes in the characteristic length scale of phase-separated structures from microdomains to nanodomains upon increasing r macroCTA from 0.00 to 1.00.…”
Section: Controlling Nanostructures In 3d Printed Materialssupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The differences in phase‐separated morphologies and domain sizes with varied r macroCTA can be explained by variations in the PIMS process during 3D printing, particularly the ability for selective swelling of PBA domains to occur. [ 55 ] For samples with r macroCTA = 1.00, the PIMS process can be considered ideal; the PBA 48 ‐CTA is efficiently chain extended to form diblock copolymers which begin to microphase separate, forming bicontinuous structures until the morphology is arrested by cross‐linking. [ 21 ] For systems containing PBA 48 in small amounts, that is, for r macroCTA = 0.75, the unreactive PBA 48 selectively swells PBA nanodomains generated during PIMS, resulting in a slightly increased domain spacing as observed by SAXS (Figure S25, Supporting Information).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In comparison to the current efforts in designing new hydrophobic materials and preparation methods, the influence of the interaction between polymers and solvents on micro/nano‐structures has been rarely investigated . In 2003, Erbil and co‐workers first reported that PP was used to prepare a gel‐like and superhydrophobic film by micro‐phase separation method on various carriers, such as glass slides, aluminum foils, and stainless steel plates .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%