Effect of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG)/follicle-stimulating hormone treatment versus hCG treatment alone on testicular descent: a double-blind placebo-controlled study
Abstract:The medical treatment of retentio testis remains controversial because of ineffectiveness and/or adverse events. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) seems to influence the spontaneous descent of the testis; furthermore, it induces luteinizing hormone (LH) receptors. Therefore, we performed a double-blind placebo-controlled study to investigate the effect of FSH with human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) versus hCG alone in retentio testis patients. Twenty-two boys with retentio testis were investigated, excluding… Show more
“…Figure summarises the study selection process along with the exclusion criteria. Seven studies that have been included in the analysis assessed the effectiveness of hCG treatment in cryptorchidism. It was noted that individual studies often included multiple arms: three studies compared hCG with gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH), two compared hCG with placebo, one compared hCG with hCG + follicle‐stimulating hormone (FSH), and two compared different doses or regimens of hCG treatment (Table ) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 summarises the study selection process along with the exclusion criteria. Seven studies that have been included in the analysis [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] assessed the effectiveness of hCG Studies included in meta-analysis (n = 7)…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Full text articles excluded (n = 7) • Non-randomised controlled trial (n = 4) • Only hCG treatment in articles (n = 2) • The same data and same author (n = 1) treatment in cryptorchidism. It was noted that individual studies often included multiple arms: three studies compared hCG with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), [14][15][16] two compared hCG with placebo, 15,23 one compared hCG with hCG + folliclestimulating hormone (FSH), 18 and two compared different doses or regimens of hCG treatment (Table 2). 19,20…”
A meta-analysis of the seven studies led us to conclude that hCG treatment is no more effective than placebo, and there were no significant differences in the effectiveness of hCG versus GnRH treatment.
“…Figure summarises the study selection process along with the exclusion criteria. Seven studies that have been included in the analysis assessed the effectiveness of hCG treatment in cryptorchidism. It was noted that individual studies often included multiple arms: three studies compared hCG with gonadotropin‐releasing hormone (GnRH), two compared hCG with placebo, one compared hCG with hCG + follicle‐stimulating hormone (FSH), and two compared different doses or regimens of hCG treatment (Table ) …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 3 summarises the study selection process along with the exclusion criteria. Seven studies that have been included in the analysis [14][15][16][17][18][19][20] assessed the effectiveness of hCG Studies included in meta-analysis (n = 7)…”
Section: Search Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Full text articles excluded (n = 7) • Non-randomised controlled trial (n = 4) • Only hCG treatment in articles (n = 2) • The same data and same author (n = 1) treatment in cryptorchidism. It was noted that individual studies often included multiple arms: three studies compared hCG with gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), [14][15][16] two compared hCG with placebo, 15,23 one compared hCG with hCG + folliclestimulating hormone (FSH), 18 and two compared different doses or regimens of hCG treatment (Table 2). 19,20…”
A meta-analysis of the seven studies led us to conclude that hCG treatment is no more effective than placebo, and there were no significant differences in the effectiveness of hCG versus GnRH treatment.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.