2012
DOI: 10.2981/11-025
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of human nuisance on the social organisation of large mammals: group sizes and compositions of seven ungulate species in Lake Mburo National Park and the adjacent Ankole Ranching Scheme

Abstract: BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations, museums, institutions, and presses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among ungulates, group living is common and is hypothesized to provide benefits via reduction in predation pressure (Averbeck et al . ). In some cases, human hunting and habitat degradation have even resulted in increased group sizes, which is hypothesized to allow greater vigilance and predator avoidance (Averbeck et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among ungulates, group living is common and is hypothesized to provide benefits via reduction in predation pressure (Averbeck et al . ). In some cases, human hunting and habitat degradation have even resulted in increased group sizes, which is hypothesized to allow greater vigilance and predator avoidance (Averbeck et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Among ungulates, group living is common and is hypothesized to provide benefits via reduction in predation pressure (Averbeck et al 2012). In some cases, human hunting and habitat degradation have even resulted in increased group sizes, which is hypothesized to allow greater vigilance and predator avoidance (Averbeck et al 2012). It is possible, therefore, that extinction drivers might decrease total abundance of species by reducing the total number of groups, while maintaining the number of individuals per group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Human activities in pastoralist communities contribute to the production and stability of the ecosystem, e.g., livestock grazing influences soil fertility [66], distribution and diversity of plants, maintains natural vegetation [67], captures carbon [68], reduces erosion, maintains soils, maintains the water holding capacity of the soil and provides habitat for wildlife [58,69,70]. Due to close links between pastoral communities, the ecosystems in which they live, and the animals they breed, pastoralism plays a significant role in the conservation and sustainable use of biodiversity [70,71,72]. Only in recent decades (i.e., since 1997) the Mutara rangelands faced dramatic land-use changes [47], mainly by dissecting the natural habitat with living fences to separate cattle from agricultural gardens and to secure landownership.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best‐fitting detection function was derived from a half‐normal key with transect effective strip width of 344.43 m. Since the numbers of urial observations on each transect were not sufficient to fit transect‐specific detection functions, the global detection probability estimate was also used for estimation of CD at transect level. We also used the cluster size (CS, individuals) to assess the effects of different variables on the urial demography (Manor & Saltz, ; Averbeck et al ., ). On each transect, we calculated the median of CS and its 95% confidence interval (CI) based on 2000 bootstrap replicates in Flocker 1.1 software (Reiczigel et al ., ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Human exploitation can alter density, demography, distribution and behaviour of ungulates (Hay et al ., ; Jachmann, ; Averbeck et al ., ) and also affects large carnivores, which are highly dependent on their prey (Kilgo, Labisky & Fritzen, ; Karanth et al ., ; Balme, Slotow & Hunter, ). Poaching is one of the most eminent threats to wildlife (Gavin, Solomon & Blank, ) and rigorous law enforcement is important in tackling poaching pressure (Rowcliffe, de Merode & Cowlishaw, ; Hilborn et al ., ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%