2011
DOI: 10.1115/1.4004948
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Implanting a Soft Tissue Autograft in a Central-Third Patellar Tendon Defect: Biomechanical and Histological Comparisons

Abstract: Previous studies by our laboratory have demonstrated that implanting a stiffer tissue engineered construct at surgery is positively correlated with repair tissue stiffness at 12 weeks. The objective of this study was to test this correlation by implanting a construct that matches normal tissue biomechanical properties. To do this, we utilized a soft tissue patellar tendon autograft to repair a central-third patellar tendon defect. Patellar tendon autograft repairs were contrasted against an unfilled defect rep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, directing stem cell differentiation and cellular proliferation with mechanical cues (Zoldan et al 2011, Lee et al 2013) has long been utilized for generating cartilage (Little et al 2011) and bone (Parekh et al 2011). More recently this concept has also been applied to materials meant to regenerate softer tissues such as tendons (Kinneberg et al 2011), cardiac valves (Wang et al 2013), cardiac muscles (Guillemette et al 2010, Chen et al 2008), and neurons (Banerjee et al 2009, Yao et al 2013). In order to obtain an optimal match between implant and native tissue, therefore, the mechanical properties of the native tissue need to be thoroughly characterized in normal and diseased states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, directing stem cell differentiation and cellular proliferation with mechanical cues (Zoldan et al 2011, Lee et al 2013) has long been utilized for generating cartilage (Little et al 2011) and bone (Parekh et al 2011). More recently this concept has also been applied to materials meant to regenerate softer tissues such as tendons (Kinneberg et al 2011), cardiac valves (Wang et al 2013), cardiac muscles (Guillemette et al 2010, Chen et al 2008), and neurons (Banerjee et al 2009, Yao et al 2013). In order to obtain an optimal match between implant and native tissue, therefore, the mechanical properties of the native tissue need to be thoroughly characterized in normal and diseased states.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gradations in matrix composition, collagen alignment, cell phenotype, and mineralization (Genin et al, 2009; Thomopoulos et al, 2003; Thomopoulos et al, 2006) help facilitate optimal force transmission while also dissipating potentially damaging interfacial stress concentrations between these mechanically dissimilar materials (Liu et al, 2011; Shaw and Benjamin, 2007). Unfortunately, once disrupted, the insertion site does not regenerate its complex natural architecture and is instead replaced by scar tissue, resulting in a mechanically inferior interface that is susceptible to further injury (Galatz et al, 2006; Kinneberg et al, 2011; Newsham-West et al, 2007; Rodeo et al, 1993). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Por un lado, la potencial alteración de la biomecánica escapulotorácica comprometiendo tanto el futuro del hombro como el resultado funcional de cualquier tratamiento una vez se ha establecido el cuadro, y por otro, el conocimiento de que el tejido cicatricial de los ligamentos rotos será de peores características biomecánicas a las originales 18 , siendo el aporte de colágeno autólogo una de las opciones de mejorar la calidad de esa cicatrización 19 .…”
Section: ¿Qué Puedo Decirle a MI Paciente En Cuanto A Resultados Espeunclassified