2001
DOI: 10.1097/00115550-200109000-00007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Impulse Duration on Patients' Perception of Electrical Stimulation and Block Effectiveness During Axillary Block in Unsedated Ambulatory Patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
7
1
1

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
7
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In keeping with other studies [6][7][8] that compared electrical stimulation with repeated needle passes and local anesthetic injection, we found that electrical impulse was the most unpleasant component of the anesthetic procedure. Koscielniak-Nielsen et al [7] reported the effect of impulse duration on patients' perception of electrical stimulation. Twenty-eight patients (64%) in short impulse duration and 22 (52%) in long impulse duration experienced pain, with a median VAS (0-100) of 21 and 24, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In keeping with other studies [6][7][8] that compared electrical stimulation with repeated needle passes and local anesthetic injection, we found that electrical impulse was the most unpleasant component of the anesthetic procedure. Koscielniak-Nielsen et al [7] reported the effect of impulse duration on patients' perception of electrical stimulation. Twenty-eight patients (64%) in short impulse duration and 22 (52%) in long impulse duration experienced pain, with a median VAS (0-100) of 21 and 24, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Several studies have assessed global pain caused by multiple electrolocation [3,8,15]. In keeping with other studies [6][7][8] that compared electrical stimulation with repeated needle passes and local anesthetic injection, we found that electrical impulse was the most unpleasant component of the anesthetic procedure. Koscielniak-Nielsen et al [7] reported the effect of impulse duration on patients' perception of electrical stimulation.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 85%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Der Stimulationserfolg ist abhängig von der Stromstärke (mA) und der Impulsbreite (ms) bei einer Stimulationsfrequenz von gewöhnlich 1-2 Hz. Zur Stimulation motorischer Nerven (Aα-Fasern) wird eine Impulsbreite von 0,1 ms,zur Stimulation sensorischer Fasern eine Impulsbreite von 0,3 ms (kleinere myelinisierte Fasern) bis 1,0 ms (C-Fasern) verwendet [30].Wird die Impulsbreite von 0,1 ms nicht überschritten, ist eine nahezu schmerzfreie selektive motorische Stimulation möglich [52].Das Gefühl der unwillkürlichen Muskelaktivität allein kann jedoch für den Patienten unangenehm sein. Deshalb sollte er darüber informiert werden.…”
Section: Anatomische Grundlagenunclassified