2011
DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2010.525540
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of impurities on the growth of {113} interstitial clusters in silicon under electron irradiation

Abstract: The growth and shrinkage of interstitial clusters on {113} planes were investigated in electron irradiated Cz-Si, Fz-Si, and impurity-doped Fz-Si (HT-Fz-Si) using a high voltage electron microscope. In Fz-Si, {113} interstitial clusters were formed only near the beam incident surface after a long incubation period, and shrank on subsequent irradiation from the backside of the specimen. In Cz-Si and HT-Fz-Si, {113} interstitial clusters nucleated uniformly throughout the specimen without incubation, and began t… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With increasing specimen thickness, the interstitial concentration goes through a maximum leading also to a maximum in {113}‐defect nucleation and growth. For further increasing specimen thickness (see the simulations for the 500, 1000 and 2000 nm specimen thickness), the bulk of the sample becomes vacancy‐rich and {113}‐defect formation is limited to the near surface areas with a thin denuded zone adjacent to the surface as also observed experimentally 10, 23. The peak concentration of interstitials also goes down, leading to slower defect formation.…”
Section: Observations and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With increasing specimen thickness, the interstitial concentration goes through a maximum leading also to a maximum in {113}‐defect nucleation and growth. For further increasing specimen thickness (see the simulations for the 500, 1000 and 2000 nm specimen thickness), the bulk of the sample becomes vacancy‐rich and {113}‐defect formation is limited to the near surface areas with a thin denuded zone adjacent to the surface as also observed experimentally 10, 23. The peak concentration of interstitials also goes down, leading to slower defect formation.…”
Section: Observations and Discussionsupporting
confidence: 56%
“…By comparing the nucleation and growth of {113}‐defects in floating zone Si during in situ irradiation in an ultra high vacuum transmission electron microscope with (pressure in the specimen chamber kept at 5 × 10 −5 Pa) and without (10 −7 Pa) oxygen injection in the specimen chamber, Koto et al 22 showed that an increasing amount of oxygen in specimen chamber vacuum enhances defect formation. Also in a recent 1 MeV in situ e‐irradiation study, it was concluded that also impurities that are introduced at the specimen surface play an important role in the nucleation of {113}‐defects 23. This shows that one should use the cleanest possible e‐beam and vacuum to avoid uncontrolled introduction of impurities in the Si specimen during irradiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is presumed that the disappearance of the defects under 1 MeV electron irradiation is due to migration of interstitial atoms to an equivalent plane, which does not satisfy the edge-on condition, or annihilation at the specimen surface. Shrinkage of the defects can also be explained by the purification of the irradiated area by the absorption of pre-existing impurities into interstitial clusters . Since {113} defects are not formed in a thin region near the specimen edge, observation in a thick region is essential for such defect dynamics characterization.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Shrinkage of the defects can also be explained by the purification of the irradiated area by the absorption of pre-existing impurities into interstitial clusters. 27 Since {113} defects are not formed in a thin region near the specimen edge, 16 observation in a thick region is essential for such defect dynamics characterization. The veiled phenomenon was hence detected by the experiment simultaneously satisfying the following three conditions using a sufficiently thick specimen: low temperatures (<100 K), highenergy electron irradiation (1 MeV), and atomic resolution.…”
Section: ■ Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%