2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of in-plane damage on out-of-plane strength of unreinforced masonry walls

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In case of a severe ground shaking, infill walls will start cracking and will start collapsing in the out-of-plane direction even if the overall structural system of the building is not severely damaged [30,31]. These unsafe conditions would cause blockage in passageways, and thus, in buildings with low or moderate damage, it is more critical to monitor non-structural infill walls rather than load carrying columns.…”
Section: Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In case of a severe ground shaking, infill walls will start cracking and will start collapsing in the out-of-plane direction even if the overall structural system of the building is not severely damaged [30,31]. These unsafe conditions would cause blockage in passageways, and thus, in buildings with low or moderate damage, it is more critical to monitor non-structural infill walls rather than load carrying columns.…”
Section: Sensorsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Verlato et al [23] developed a numerical model of infill masonry walls to carry out parametric analyses for better understanding the main factors influencing the OOP behavior. A nonlinear finite element model was adopted by Agnihotri et al [24] to consider the influence of slenderness ratio and aspect ratio on IP and OOP interaction. Based on a series of finite element analyses, Zizzo et al [25] proposed a formulation for the OOP strength reduction factor.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Computational modelling 29 technology provides a valid and useful alternative to experimental studies. To date, numerical 30 models have been developed based on different theories such as the Finite Element Method (FEM) 31 [7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22] and the Distinct and Discrete Element Methods (DEM) [11,[23][24][25]. Of these, FEM-based 32 models and software are the most popular and widely available.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FEM modelling strategies can be 33 broadly classified into three categories [22]: micro-scale, meso-scale and macro-scale modelling. Macro-scale modelling regards all the components of masonry as a single continuum in which solid 37 elements or shell elements are widely adopted [7][8][9][10][11][12]. The constitutive material models are initially 38 simplified to be homogeneous and isotropic and concrete damage plasticity and concrete smeared 39 7 (triangular and rectangular voids in Fig.2 (c) and triangular and quadrangular prisms in Fig.2 (b)), to 141 permit co-ordination of the deformation between the cohesive elements and the adjacent solid 142 elements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%