2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2005.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of incidental detection for survival of patients with renal cell carcinoma: Results of population-based study of 701 patients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

5
50
1
7

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
5
50
1
7
Order By: Relevance
“…[18][19][20] In our study, the cancer-specific survival rate was significantly higher for tumors detected incidentally, compared to those detected symptomatically; this result suggests that the early detection of PRCC is important for good prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…[18][19][20] In our study, the cancer-specific survival rate was significantly higher for tumors detected incidentally, compared to those detected symptomatically; this result suggests that the early detection of PRCC is important for good prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 45%
“…Her iki grupta, takip süresi içinde ölen toplam hasta sayısı, rastlantısal vakalarda 21 (%32. [14][15][16][17][18][19] Genel olarak BHK'li vakalarda, tümör çapı ve evresi arttıkça tümör rekürrensinin de arttığı ve sağkalım süresinin azaldığı bilinmektedir. Salama ve ark.…”
Section: Bulgularunclassified
“…[14] rastlantısal BHK vakalarını erken evrede yakalamanın tek başına anlamlı olmadığını, en önemli prognostik parametrenin tümörün evresi ve nükleer derecesi olduğunu savunmuştur. Ancak buna rağmen tümör büyüklüğü için 2.3 cm'nin kritik eşik olduğunu bildirmektedir.…”
Section: Bulgularunclassified
“…24 The improved cancer-specific survival of incidental cases has not, thus far, resulted in a decrease in overall mortality from kidney cancer, perhaps because of this lead-time bias. 25 The most important limitation of our retrospective single centre study was that we only reported patients who underwent nephrectomy. As a result, we were not able to report incidence or prevalence of RCC given that this was an analysis of a purely surgical series.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%