2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-005-0030-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of initial fertilisation on biomass and nutrient contentof Norway spruce and Douglas-fir plantations at the same site

Abstract: Norway spruce (NS) and Douglas-fir (DF) are among the main species used for production forestry in France. In low-elevation mountains and under-acidic conditions, they often occupy the same ecological situations. It is therefore of paramount interest to have a good understanding of how the two species behave under similar conditions and how they react to site improvement by fertilisation. The study stands are part of an experimental stand located in the estate forest of Breuil-Chenue in the Morvan (east centra… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0
1

Year Published

2007
2007
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 43 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
1
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…35,36 However, the Cl − levels in (throughfall and stemflow) from oak and beech were almost equal to the estimated total deposition (Figure 1 (Figure 1), despite having a larger standing foliage biomass (31 t dry mass ha −1 versus 18 t dry mass ha −1 , respectively). 37 Thus, throughfall was independent of foliage biomass, indicating that speciesdependent leaching could be more important for the observed differences between stands than possible differences in capturing dry deposition.…”
Section: Environmental Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…35,36 However, the Cl − levels in (throughfall and stemflow) from oak and beech were almost equal to the estimated total deposition (Figure 1 (Figure 1), despite having a larger standing foliage biomass (31 t dry mass ha −1 versus 18 t dry mass ha −1 , respectively). 37 Thus, throughfall was independent of foliage biomass, indicating that speciesdependent leaching could be more important for the observed differences between stands than possible differences in capturing dry deposition.…”
Section: Environmental Science and Technologymentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Compared to other tree parts, coarse roots have lower nutrient contents than foliage but higher contents than stem wood (Hellsten et al 2013;Sicard et al 2006). Roots contents of nutrients -especially N but also P, K, Ca Mg and Na -increase with reductions in their size.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Roots contents of nutrients -especially N but also P, K, Ca Mg and Na -increase with reductions in their size. For roots below a diameter of 60-80 mm, the concentration of N can become quite high (0.05-0.35%) (Hellsten et al 2013), compared to stemwood (0.015-0.055%) (Sicard et al 2006). The content of N in large fine roots, 2-5 mm in diameter, is even higher (~0.7%) and the content in small fine roots < 2 mm is higher still (~1%) (Gordon and Jackson 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Brown and van den Driessche 2005;Coleman et al 2004). In some cases, the effects of a single fertilisation event on productivity can be observed even after many years (Sicard et al 2006). The effects of N availability are also well-documented with regard to the productivity, biomass allocation and architecture of forest tree species (Dickson 1989;Gessler et al 2004).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%