Effect of inspection time and direction of rotation on a generalized from of the spiral aftereffect.

Bakan, Paul; Mizusawa, Kiyoe

doi:10.1037/h0041383

Cited by 25 publications

(14 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…In addition, we found an asymmetry between contracting and expanding motion, with adaptation to contracting motion producing longer MAE duration. This latter result is consistent with previous findings (Bakan & Mizusawa, 1963;Reinhardt-Rutland, 1994;Scott, Lavender, McWhirt, & Powell, 1966).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 95%

“…There is wide evidence for longer MAE durations following adaptation to contracting patterns (expanding aftereffect) compared with expanding patterns (contracting aftereffect; Bakan & Mizusawa, 1963;Reinhardt-Rutland, 1994;Scott et al, 1966), but the origin of such an asymmetry and its functional role remains to be determined. However, there is evidence that it can be reduced with practice (Scott et al, 1966).…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Motion-form interactions beyond the motion integration level: Evidence for interactions between orientation and optic flow signals

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Motion and form encoding are closely coupled in the visual system. A number of physiological studies have shown that neurons in the striate and extrastriate cortex (e.g., V1 and MT) are selective for motion direction parallel to their preferred orientation, but some neurons also respond to motion orthogonal to their preferred spatial orientation. Recent psychophysical research (Mather, Pavan, Bellacosa, & Casco, 2012) has demonstrated that the strength of adaptation to two fields of transparently moving dots is modulated by simultaneously presented orientation signals, suggesting that the interaction occurs at the level of motion integrating receptive fields in the extrastriate cortex. In the present psychophysical study, we investigated whether motion-form interactions take place at a higher level of neural processing where optic flow components are extracted. In Experiment 1, we measured the duration of the motion aftereffect (MAE) generated by contracting or expanding dot fields in the presence of either radial (parallel) or concentric (orthogonal) counterphase pedestal gratings. To tap the stage at which optic flow is extracted, we measured the duration of the phantom MAE (Weisstein, Maguire, & Berbaum, 1977) in which we adapted and tested different parts of the visual field, with orientation signals presented either in the adapting (Experiment 2) or nonadapting (Experiments 3 and 4) sectors. Overall, the results showed that motion adaptation is suppressed most by orientation signals orthogonal to optic flow direction, suggesting that motion-form interactions also take place at the global motion level where optic flow is extracted.

show abstract

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 95%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 97%

Motion-form interactions beyond the motion integration level: Evidence for interactions between orientation and optic flow signals

2013

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…In addition, exposure to an apparently expanding spiral and to an apparently contracting spiral during complementary stimulation induced aftereffects of comparable size, while expansion produced the larger aftereffect in the case of monocular and binocular stimulation. This latter trend matches findings from other studies (e.g., Bakan & Mizusawa, 1963;Scott, Lavender, McWhirt, & Powell, 1966). There is no obvious reason why directional differences in magnitude were not obtained under the conditions of complementary stimulation.…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 78%

Monocular-contingent and binocular-contingent aftereffects

Jiao

Han

Jing

et al. 1984

Perception & Psychophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Early studies of the motion aftereffect (MAE) found that the duration and time constant increased as inspection duration increased up to 5 min (Bakan & Mizusawa, 1963;Taylor, 1963), whereas more recent studies found no increase in duration after about 30-60 sec of inspection (Bonnet, 1973;Lehmkuhle & Fox, 1975). The latter description has received support from Sekuler (1975), who found that the elevation of direction-specific motion detection thresholds increased with increasing inspection duration up to about 100 sec of adaptation, whereas inspection durations of 35-45 min yielded threshold values nearly identical to those for 100 sec of adaptation.…”

Section: Maurice Hershenson Brandeis University Waltham Massachusettsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Duration, time constant, and decay of the linear motion aftereffect as a function of inspection duration

Hershenson

1989

Perception & Psychophysics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Subjects rated the strength of the motion aftereffect (MAE) produced by the upward motion of a horizontal grating in two experiments. Inspection periods ranged from 30 to 900 sec in Experiment 1 and from 20 to 120 sec in Experiment 2. A minimum of 22 h elapsed between trials. The decay time constant increased as the square root of the inspection duration for values between 1 min and 15 min of inspection. The ratings suggested that the MAEs consisted of three phases: an initial maximum-strength phase, a decay phase, and a tail. The duration of all three phases increased and the decay rate decreased with increasing inspection duration over the entire range. The results indicate that duration, time constant, and decay rate are not fixed properties of the motion-processing channels in the visual system.

show abstract

Effect of inspection time and direction of rotation on a generalized from of the spiral aftereffect.

Cited by 25 publications

References 21 publications

Motion-form interactions beyond the motion integration level: Evidence for interactions between orientation and optic flow signals

Motion-form interactions beyond the motion integration level: Evidence for interactions between orientation and optic flow signals

Monocular-contingent and binocular-contingent aftereffects

Duration, time constant, and decay of the linear motion aftereffect as a function of inspection duration

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About