2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.geomorph.2022.108448
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of interpolation methods on quantifying terrain surface roughness under different data densities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Kriging aims to predict the value of the random variable z(x 0 ) at an unsampled point x 0 of a geographical region [56,57] by assuming the following model:…”
Section: Ordinary Krigingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kriging aims to predict the value of the random variable z(x 0 ) at an unsampled point x 0 of a geographical region [56,57] by assuming the following model:…”
Section: Ordinary Krigingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, these methods utilize a particular mathematical model to forecast missing data (Chen, Gao, et al., 2022). The commonly used spatial interpolator includes inverse distance weighting (IDW) (Liang et al., 2018), Kriging (Jeffrey et al., 2001), radial basis function (Chen, Bei, et al., 2022), and Point interpolation based on Biased Sentinel Hospitals Areal Disease Estimation (P‐BSHADE) (Jiang et al., 2018; Xu et al., 2013, 2022). Meanwhile, two commonly used temporal interpolation methods are simple exponential smoothing (SES) (Cheng & Lu, 2017) and autoregressive integrated moving average (Kotu & Deshpande, 2019).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, interpolation is used to generate a DEM from deficient data. Currently, interpolation methods such as the nearest neighbor method, Kriging, and inverse distance weighting are used to generate DEMs [4]. However, their accuracy can degrade in regions with sparse data.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%