2016
DOI: 10.1002/nme.5212
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of interpolation on noise propagation from images to DIC displacement maps

Abstract: International audienceThis paper introduces and validates a new prediction of sensor noise propagation from images of randomly marked surfaces to displacement maps obtained by Digital Image Correlation (DIC). Images are indeed often affected by sensor noise, which propagates to DIC output. We consider here the 2D global DIC (G-DIC), for which this output is the in-plane displacement calculated at a set of nodes. Predictive formula for the resolution of the displacement at these nodes is already available in th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
33
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A full comparison of both methods in the context of the assessment of DIC algorithms is beyond the scope of this paper. Comparing the retrieved displacement field with respect to the prescribed displacement field indeed depends on various factors such as the systematic bias modeled by a Savitzky-Golay filter [43], error caused by the interpolation scheme needed by DIC itself [7,8], the shape of the speckle patterns [29,30], and quantization noise. It is thus difficult to isolate the error solely caused by the process rendering the input speckle images.…”
Section: Comparing the Proposed Rendering Methods With Interpolation Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A full comparison of both methods in the context of the assessment of DIC algorithms is beyond the scope of this paper. Comparing the retrieved displacement field with respect to the prescribed displacement field indeed depends on various factors such as the systematic bias modeled by a Savitzky-Golay filter [43], error caused by the interpolation scheme needed by DIC itself [7,8], the shape of the speckle patterns [29,30], and quantization noise. It is thus difficult to isolate the error solely caused by the process rendering the input speckle images.…”
Section: Comparing the Proposed Rendering Methods With Interpolation Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DIC assessment is, however, likely to be affected by the interpolation scheme. In order to reduce the influence of interpolation, a possibility is to generate low-resolution images by binning pixels of an interpolated high-resolution deformed speckle image [4,6,7,10,18,31,41].…”
Section: Synthetic Speckle Rendering For Dicmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, an estimate of the average displacement resolution over the observed zone was proposed, e.g., [2,39]. Later on, local predictions of the resolution were introduced; see for instance [35,36,18,4]. However, their validation using experimental data has not been carefully studied.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2c). The interpolation process will, however, change the noise properties of the resulting dataset (20), which can have an influence on further analysis requiring specific assumptions in noise properties such as Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) single-molecule localization analyses. For the specific case of SMLM datasets with sparse blinking, An artificially large drift was applied computationally in order to make it visible for figure rendering.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%