1976
DOI: 10.4992/jjpsy.47.202
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Intra-Pattern Transformation Structures Upon Goodness Judgments of Two-Dimensional Patterns

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1982
1982
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, goodness is considered to relate to regularity not only in geometrical regularity but also in the comprehensive regularity shown in impressions. The rating score for the evaluation factor often corresponds to that of the regularity factor (Imai et al. 1976; Matsuda, 1978; Miura, 2007; Miura & Inoue, 2000; Oyama, Yamada, & Iwasawa, 1998), although each factor obtained using factor analysis is theoretically independent of the others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, goodness is considered to relate to regularity not only in geometrical regularity but also in the comprehensive regularity shown in impressions. The rating score for the evaluation factor often corresponds to that of the regularity factor (Imai et al. 1976; Matsuda, 1978; Miura, 2007; Miura & Inoue, 2000; Oyama, Yamada, & Iwasawa, 1998), although each factor obtained using factor analysis is theoretically independent of the others.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the Gestaltists, many have attempted to define goodness in operational terms or in quantitative ways, for example, using geometrical properties like the number of lines, the degrees of corners, and position (Hochberg & Brooks, 1960; Wilson & Chatterjee, 2005), the amount of information (Attneave & Arnoult, 1956), redundancy (Garner & Clement, 1963), the amount of structural information (Leeuwenberg, 1969) and transformation structure (Hamada & Ishihara, 1988; Imai, 1977; Imai, Ito, & Ito, 1976). The experimental data generally fit with these theories as long as limited stimuli are used, such as experimentally controlled, simple, and meaningless geometric shapes and patterns.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, using linear binary patterns as stimuli, Imai et al (1976) have reported that judged complexity increases with the number of runs whereas judged goodness does not. Thus, although the two concepts, pattern goodness and pattern simplicity (or complexity), have a fairly high correlation, they are not identical.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In their experiment, two patterns are said to be equivalent if one pattern is produced by reflections and 9O-deg rotations of the other. Although Garner directly related pattern goodness to the size of equivalent subsets, Imai et al (1976) related it to the intrapattern transformation structures, rather than the subset size. The transformation structures of patterns were defined by invariant properties for three cognitive transformations: mirroring on a diagonal axis, mirroring on the vertical axis, and 180-deg rotation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The transformation structures of individual pat-Structure of pattern and a detailed data terns are defined by their invariance property for a set of transformations (see Imai, 1983;Imai, Ito, & Ito, 1976 In the main part of this article, 22 patterns of structures S1 to S5, 24 patterns of structures S6 and S7, and 24 patterns of structure S8 are categorized as high-, medium-, and low-invariance patterns (PH, PM, PL), respectively.…”
Section: Appendixmentioning
confidence: 99%