Effect of Irritrol™ endodontic irrigant and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal dentine: A scanning electron microscopic analysis

Bhattacharya, Swastika; Purayil, Tina Puthen; Ballal, Vasudev; Pentapati, Kalyana Chakravarthy

doi:10.4103/sej.sej_94_19

Cited by 4 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[ 20 ] This phenomenon occurs due to the fact that the phosphate groups attract the calcium ions, causing crystal nucleation and the formation of a calcium phosphate layer,[ 21 ] whereas EDTA, on the other hand, is incapable of remineralizing demineralized dentin. [ 22 ] Hence, this could be the reason for the highest surface hardness and less roughness of CNS compared to EDTA. Similar to the present study, the effect of EDTA showed lower pushout strength of Biodentine compared to CSN.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of different root canal irrigants on surface roughness and microhardness of Biodentine combined with triple antibiotic paste: An in vitro study

Halkai,

Ishaq,

Halkai

et al. 2024

Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background: Biodentine is widely used for endodontic applications; recently, it has been incorporated with triple antibiotic paste (TAP). The effect of endodontic irrigants on the physical characteristics of this new combination needs to be studied. Aims: The aim of the study was to evaluate the surface roughness and microhardness of Biodentine incorporated with TAP subjected to various endodontic irrigants. Materials and Methods: Hundred cylindrical discs (6 mm × 3 mm) were prepared by mixing the Biodentine with TAP (3:1). The specimens were subjected to different irrigating solutions for 5 min in 5 groups (n = 20): Group 1: distilled water (control), Group 2: 2.5% sodium hypochlorite, Group 3: 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid, Group 4: 2% chlorhexidine (CHX), and Group 5: 2% chitosan nanoparticles (CSNs). Half of the specimens in each group were subjected to surface roughness (n = 10) and another half to microhardness (n = 10). Surface roughness was measured using a surface roughness tester, and digital Vickers microhardness testing was performed on each specimen. Statistical Analysis: One-way ANOVA and post hoc Tukey’s tests (P ≤ 0.05) were used. Results: The highest microhardness was found with 2% CSN, whereas 2% CSN and 2% CHX had a minimal effect on the surface roughness of Biodentine incorporated with TAP (P ≤ 0.05). Conclusion: The root canal irrigant 2% CSN exhibited the highest microhardness and least surface roughness of modified Biodentine with TAP.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of different root canal irrigants on surface roughness and microhardness of Biodentine combined with triple antibiotic paste: An in vitro study

Halkai,

Ishaq,

Halkai

et al. 2024

Journal of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

Biological and chemical properties of 2-in-1 calcium-chelating and antibacterial root canal irrigants

Ballal

Narkedamalli

Gandhi

et al. 2023

Journal of Dentistry

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The effect of final irrigation with different solutions on smear layer removal and dentin erosion: A scanning electron microscope study

AlBatati,

AbuMostafa

2024

PLoS ONE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Aim This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of initial irrigation with sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl) and final irrigation with QMix, 40% citric acid, and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) on smear layer removal and dentin erosion. Methodology Forty extracted human mandibular premolar teeth were randomly divided into four groups (n = 10) according to the type of final irrigants used: 17% EDTA, QMix, citric acid, and control (normal saline). Canals were mechanically prepared using ProTaper Next instruments to an apical size of X3. Subsequently, the roots were sectioned in a buccolingual direction. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was used to assess the presence of the smear layer and the amount of dentin erosion in the coronal, middle, and apical thirds of the root canals. Results In regards to smear layer removal, there was a significant difference between the control group and the other tested groups. Moreover, it was significantly higher in the coronal and middle thirds than in the apical third. However, there were no significant differences between the groups of EDTA, QMix, and citric acid. Concerning dentin erosion, citric acid produced significantly more dentin erosion than the other tested groups. Conclusion Final irrigation with solutions had a higher ability to remove the smear layer in the coronal and middle thirds compared to the apical third. Of all the solutions tested, 40% citric acid had the most pronounced impact on dentin erosion, followed by 17% EDTA and QMix.

show abstract

Effect of Irritrol™ endodontic irrigant and ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid in smear layer removal from instrumented human root canal dentine: A scanning electron microscopic analysis

Cited by 4 publications

References 0 publications

Effect of different root canal irrigants on surface roughness and microhardness of Biodentine combined with triple antibiotic paste: An in vitro study

Effect of different root canal irrigants on surface roughness and microhardness of Biodentine combined with triple antibiotic paste: An in vitro study

Biological and chemical properties of 2-in-1 calcium-chelating and antibacterial root canal irrigants

The effect of final irrigation with different solutions on smear layer removal and dentin erosion: A scanning electron microscope study

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About