2023
DOI: 10.2490/prm.20230013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Leg Length Discrepancy on Dynamic Gait Stability

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

2
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
2
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These variations in the duration of consecutive gait cycles contributed to no more than a 1.0% increase in stride time and a 1.0% decrease in cadence during locomotion at 3 cm LLD compared to no-LLD (Figure 7). The decrease in SLS step length compared to LLS step length as well, as the minimal albeit significant changes in stride length found in the present study during treadmill walking, were supported by previously recorded data on an instrumented treadmill [57] as well as during overground walking in subjects with either artificially induced LLD [58,59] or anatomical LLD of ≥2 cm [40]. In accordance with our findings, step width has also been found to be increased as LLD increased, with some authors detecting significant differences in subjects with artificially induced LLD of 2 cm during treadmill walking [57] but not with 3 cm LLD during overground walking [59].…”
Section: Effects Of Lld On Spatiotemporal Gait Parameterssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These variations in the duration of consecutive gait cycles contributed to no more than a 1.0% increase in stride time and a 1.0% decrease in cadence during locomotion at 3 cm LLD compared to no-LLD (Figure 7). The decrease in SLS step length compared to LLS step length as well, as the minimal albeit significant changes in stride length found in the present study during treadmill walking, were supported by previously recorded data on an instrumented treadmill [57] as well as during overground walking in subjects with either artificially induced LLD [58,59] or anatomical LLD of ≥2 cm [40]. In accordance with our findings, step width has also been found to be increased as LLD increased, with some authors detecting significant differences in subjects with artificially induced LLD of 2 cm during treadmill walking [57] but not with 3 cm LLD during overground walking [59].…”
Section: Effects Of Lld On Spatiotemporal Gait Parameterssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The decrease in SLS step length compared to LLS step length as well, as the minimal albeit significant changes in stride length found in the present study during treadmill walking, were supported by previously recorded data on an instrumented treadmill [57] as well as during overground walking in subjects with either artificially induced LLD [58,59] or anatomical LLD of ≥2 cm [40]. In accordance with our findings, step width has also been found to be increased as LLD increased, with some authors detecting significant differences in subjects with artificially induced LLD of 2 cm during treadmill walking [57] but not with 3 cm LLD during overground walking [59]. In addition, previous studies performed in subjects with artificially induced LLD up to 3 cm during treadmill walking confirmed the increased SLS step time compared to LLS step time, and the minor changes in stride time among LLDs [57] found in the present study.…”
Section: Effects Of Lld On Spatiotemporal Gait Parameterssupporting
confidence: 91%