2014
DOI: 10.1208/s12249-014-0096-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Lipolysis on Drug Release from Self-microemulsifying Drug Delivery Systems (SMEDDS) with Different Core/Shell Drug Location

Abstract: Abstract. The objective of this study is to investigate the effect of lipolysis on the release of poorly watersoluble drug from SMEDDS in the perspective of drug core/shell location. For this purpose, four SMEDDS formulations with various core/shell properties were developed based on long-chain lipid or medium-chain lipid as well as different surfactant/oil ratios. Poorly water-soluble drugs, hymecromone and resveratrol, were significantly solubilized in all SMEDDS formulations and the diluted microemulsions. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This observation suggests that LVF is protected from either of the pure bulk domain (oil and water), point towards the close confinement of LVF molecules in μE. All these results indicate that the probe associated with micro aggregates may possibly reside in the interfacial vicinity, where the propagation of the excitation is inhibited and in which rotation of LVF molecules is further restricted ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…This observation suggests that LVF is protected from either of the pure bulk domain (oil and water), point towards the close confinement of LVF molecules in μE. All these results indicate that the probe associated with micro aggregates may possibly reside in the interfacial vicinity, where the propagation of the excitation is inhibited and in which rotation of LVF molecules is further restricted ,…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 69%
“…Despite the fact that the effect of particle size seemed not to be a key factor affecting the diffusion coefficients, smaller SME-2 diffused faster than larger SME-1, which both contain MCT as the oil phase. In our previous report, 19 the poorly water-soluble drug resveratrol was demonstrated to be located in the hydrophobic core (the oil phase and the palisade layer of surfactant) of microemulsions, while hymecromone was located in the hydrophilic shell (the hydrophilic headgroup layer of surfactant) of microemulsions. The diffusion of drugs with different locations in the microemulsions was also compared in this study.…”
Section: Molecular Pharmaceuticsmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Microemulsions were obtained by the dilution of SMEDDS formulations, which were prepared following our previous report. 19 Briefly, oil phase (MCT, ethyl oleate or castor oil), surfactant (Cremophor RH40) and cosurfactant (1, 2-propanediol) were accurately weighted into sealed glass vials according to the ratios shown in Table 1. Poorly water-soluble drug (hymecromone or resveratrol) or fluorescent probe was added into the mixture.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The type and amount of each intermediate phase is highly associated with the types of surfactant and oil, the surfactant/oil ratio, as well as the physicochemical properties of microemulsions during digestion 23 . In our previous work, we found the dissolution rate of drug from microemulsions was affected by lipolysis, which was related to the extent of the digested oil phase 24 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%