2001
DOI: 10.1006/exnr.2000.7575
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Lipopolysaccharide on the Morphology and Integrin Immunoreactivity of Ramified Microglia in the Mouse Brain and in Cell Culture

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

12
123
1
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 162 publications
(137 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
12
123
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The second possible explanation is that the ramified microglia may not appropriately reflect resting phenotype. It was reported that systemic injection of LPS activates brain microglia, but does not cause them to transform into amoeboid macrophages (Kloss et al, 2001). Recent in vivo studies also showed that ramified microglia in the normal brain carry out homeostatic surveillance, therefore, it is not justified to consider ramified microglia as resting microglia (Hanisch and Kettenmann, 2007;Nimmerjahn et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second possible explanation is that the ramified microglia may not appropriately reflect resting phenotype. It was reported that systemic injection of LPS activates brain microglia, but does not cause them to transform into amoeboid macrophages (Kloss et al, 2001). Recent in vivo studies also showed that ramified microglia in the normal brain carry out homeostatic surveillance, therefore, it is not justified to consider ramified microglia as resting microglia (Hanisch and Kettenmann, 2007;Nimmerjahn et al, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this might either be due to a direct effect of A 2A Rs known to be present in microglia cells [41,42,216] or because A 2A R antagonists control the evolution of the severity of convulsion and associated neurotoxicity triggered by cumulative sub-threshold amygdala kindling or by kainate injection [284], which pre-date microglia recruitment. It was also recently shown that an A 2A R antagonist (SCH 58261) can prevent the hippocampal neuronal dysfunction and neurotoxicity triggered by the direct administration of lipopolyssaccharide (LPS) [285], a potent inflammatory trigger and activator of microglia cells (see e.g., [286,287]). Interestingly, SCH 58261 also attenuated the LPS-induced neuro-inflammation, as evaluated by the abolishment of LPS-induced increase in interleukin 1b levels and the recruitment of activated microglia [285].…”
Section: A 2a Receptor Blockade Confers Robust Neuroprotectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resident microglia in the healthy brain display a ''resting state" appearing in a downgraded phenotype, with highly ramified morphology and a low expression of membrane receptors that serve 0091 immunological functions [123]; even in this resting state microglia are highly active as shown by the high motility of their processes and protrusions observed by two-photon imaging analysis of brain in vivo ( [53,173]). Microglia are the first cell type that sense any form of disturbance of the brain and rapidly activate through a well-characterized and graded response; the inner cytoskeleton changes and the cell body becomes enlarged, bearing shorter and thicker cytoplasmic processes ( [174,218]).…”
Section: Role Of Microglia In Neurodegenerationmentioning
confidence: 99%