2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1520704
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of medium permeability on the perpendicular recording process

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inThe effects of oxygen on intergranular exchange and anisotropy dispersion in Co ∕ Pd multilayers for perpendicular magnetic recording media J. Appl. Phys. 99, 08E708 (2006); 10.1063/1.2162487Reverse dc erase medium noise analysis on exchange-coupling effect in coupled granular/continuous perpendicular recording media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This imaging has also been referred to as an interaction between head and medium [69,70]. An alternative way to describe this phenomenon is to assign to the medium a permeability greater than one [71]. On the other hand, it has to be said that both the pole and the SUL may be saturated during the writing process and consequently the imaging effect is destroyed.…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This imaging has also been referred to as an interaction between head and medium [69,70]. An alternative way to describe this phenomenon is to assign to the medium a permeability greater than one [71]. On the other hand, it has to be said that both the pole and the SUL may be saturated during the writing process and consequently the imaging effect is destroyed.…”
Section: 32mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effective media permeability is calculated using (1) Current 1 Tb design uses media of magnetization of approximately 700 emu/cm and anisotropy field of around 18 kOe. Owing to the nonzero magnetic susceptibility of the media, reluctance arguments suggest that the head would see a thinner media than it is physically [3]. Therefore, 20-nm-thick media would appear as 13 nm thick for permeability of 1.5.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…In all cases, the upper areas of the head (nontip region) were approximated by vertically oriented magnetizations (saturated for write field calculations, zero for remanent calculations); in other words, the nontip regions are not treated micromagnetically. The head-media interactions have been treated in an empirical way [3] using a media permeability of 1.5. Effective media permeability is calculated using (1) Current 1 Tb design uses media of magnetization of approximately 700 emu/cm and anisotropy field of around 18 kOe.…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a strong dependence of medium thickness on the effective write field, i.e., the thicker media will degrade the writability. An argument for using a thicker medium layer based on the permeability of the recording layer effectively reducing the medium thickness is made by Victora [4], [18]. However, more recent investigations [19] have indicated only an approximate 10% gain in the write field for the case when the pole tip of the head is not fully saturated.…”
Section: Effective Switching Field Analysis Of a Shielded Headmentioning
confidence: 97%