2000
DOI: 10.2307/3345455
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Melodic Context, Tuning Behaviors, and Experience on the Intonation Accuracy of Wind Players

Abstract: In the first of two experiments, subjects ( N = 137) were band students with 1, 2, 3, or 4 years of formal instrumental performance experience. Subjects tuned to a single prerecorded tuning pitch and subsequently played along with a prerecorded four-measure melody. Direction and magnitude of pitch deviation were analyzed for the single tuning pitch and four selected target pitches within the melody. Responses to the tuning pitch were more accurate than for the melodic pitches. There was a high positive correla… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

9
40
1
3

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
9
40
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no difference in the distribution of in-tune, sharp, and flat responses across tuning stimuli, a result that differs from the "preference for sharpness" effect in previous research (Geringer, 1978;Geringer & Witt, 1985, Madsen, Edmonson, & Geringer, 1969Morrison, 2000;Salzberg, 1980;Yarbrough et al, 1997). Comparisons of magnitude of pitch deviation revealed mostly small differences, perhaps without practical meaningfulness, except in two cases where participants were 6 and 9 cents more flat than sharp.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…There was no difference in the distribution of in-tune, sharp, and flat responses across tuning stimuli, a result that differs from the "preference for sharpness" effect in previous research (Geringer, 1978;Geringer & Witt, 1985, Madsen, Edmonson, & Geringer, 1969Morrison, 2000;Salzberg, 1980;Yarbrough et al, 1997). Comparisons of magnitude of pitch deviation revealed mostly small differences, perhaps without practical meaningfulness, except in two cases where participants were 6 and 9 cents more flat than sharp.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…This was in fact the case in a study of elementary through high school instrumentalists' pitch accuracy in melodic contexts (Morrison, 2000). Intonation responses to a target pitch (G) were similar across ascending, sustained, descending, and repeated-note conditions and significantly less accurate than responses to a same-octave, isolated B-flat.…”
mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because previous research indicates that both age and experience can affect melodic perception and error detection (Lamont, 1998;Morrison, 2000), the present study began to examine if a combination of age and experience might reveal a consistent ability in melodic error detection during performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since the Renaissance, ratio theorists and like-minded composers have tended to favour Just ratios over Pythagorean, perhaps because they involve smaller numbers and therefore seem more plausible (Barlow, 1987;Gilmore, 1995;Hasegawa, 2006) -in spite of the practical impossibility of justly tuning all intervals between all tones in a regular diatonic scale. But modern empirical research on intonation in music performance has repeatedly shown that in the performance of Western tonal music tuning tends to be closer on average to 12 equal subdivisions per octave (12-EDO) or Pythagorean than to Just (Devaney, Mandel, & Fujinaga, 2012;Duke, 1985;Greene, 1937;Karrick, 1998;Loosen, 1993;Mason, 1960;Morrison, 2000;Nickerson, 1949;O'Keefe, 1975;Rakowski, 1985;Sundberg, 1982).…”
Section: Theories Based On Number or Frequency Ratiosmentioning
confidence: 99%