2008
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.g.00499
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Micrometer-Scale Roughness of the Surface of Ti6Al4V Pedicle Screws in Vitro and in Vivo

Abstract: Increased micrometer-scale surface roughness increases osteoblast differentiation and local factor production in vitro, which may contribute to increased bone formation and osteointegration in vivo. There was a correlation between in vitro and in vivo observations, indicating that the use of screws with rough surfaces will result in better bone-implant contact and implant stability.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

4
125
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 143 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
4
125
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The use of a pilot hole smaller than the internal diameter (core) of the screw promotes a radial displacement and impaction of cancellous bone by the core of the screw during its insertion, resulting in greater bone-screw contact and a larger area of bone inside the screw thread. There are limited reports on the histomorphometric analysis of the pedicle screw-bone interface; compression of the cancellous bone by the screw during its insertion is considered to increase its density and pullout strength, which is thought to explain the higher pullout strength observed in the conical pedicle screw [10,37] and pedicle screw implanted without tapping [10,34]. The holding power of cancellous screws inserted into a cadaveric femur through pilot holes smaller than those proposed by the manufacturer increased significantly the pullout strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The use of a pilot hole smaller than the internal diameter (core) of the screw promotes a radial displacement and impaction of cancellous bone by the core of the screw during its insertion, resulting in greater bone-screw contact and a larger area of bone inside the screw thread. There are limited reports on the histomorphometric analysis of the pedicle screw-bone interface; compression of the cancellous bone by the screw during its insertion is considered to increase its density and pullout strength, which is thought to explain the higher pullout strength observed in the conical pedicle screw [10,37] and pedicle screw implanted without tapping [10,34]. The holding power of cancellous screws inserted into a cadaveric femur through pilot holes smaller than those proposed by the manufacturer increased significantly the pullout strength.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most published studies concerning pedicle screw pullout strength have used autopsied bone [11,13,17] or synthetic materials [9,14,21], whereas living bone has rarely been evaluated [37]. In living bone, the holding power of the screw is related to the bone adjacent to the screw, which is the weakest element in the bone-screw component [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, UV treatment might facilitate osseointegration and implant stability (18). Schwartz et al described the effect of surface roughness on human osteoblast-like cell behavior (19). When osteoblast-like cells were cultured on a grit-blasted titanium surface (Ra = 2.0-3.3 µm), levels of osteocalcin, transforming growth factor-β1, and osteoprotegerin secretion were higher than in cells cultured on a smooth surface (Ra = 0.2 µm) (19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schwartz et al described the effect of surface roughness on human osteoblast-like cell behavior (19). When osteoblast-like cells were cultured on a grit-blasted titanium surface (Ra = 2.0-3.3 µm), levels of osteocalcin, transforming growth factor-β1, and osteoprotegerin secretion were higher than in cells cultured on a smooth surface (Ra = 0.2 µm) (19). In addition, they noted that the torque required to remove titanium screws from bone was higher for a grit-blasted surface than a smooth surface (19).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface types described here have been extensively used in orthopaedic implants with overall similar outcomes (Schwartz et al 2008). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%