2018
DOI: 10.2355/isijinternational.isijint-2017-531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Microstructure and Precipitates on Mechanical Properties of Cr–Mo–V Alloy Steel with Different Austenitizing Temperatures

Abstract: The mechanical properties of as-quenched and tempered steels are affected by austenitizing temperature. The present work has investigated the effect of austenitizing temperature on martensitic microstructure, carbide precipitates and mechanical properties of 30NiCrMoV12 alloy steel for the axle of high-speed train. The martensitic microstructure and carbide precipitates were studied using OM, FE-SEM, TEM, EBSD and EDS. Thermodynamic calculation of equilibrium precipitation were carried out by Thermo-Calc softw… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The lamellar spacing indicated in Figure 6, as a function of the distance from the surface of the hot deformed bar, showed a higher difference for the middle zone where, due to the larger difference in the strain and cooling rate, the spacing was expected to increase. However, Figure 3 shows that the variation in hardness was larger in the upper zone, which means that lamellar spacing is not the only factor to determine the mechanical properties and that PAGS is also important [12]. It is also important that the 95% confidence interval at the center of the bar was large for both zones, as this is a zone where the cooling rate is lower and the effect of strain in lamellar spacing is stronger.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The lamellar spacing indicated in Figure 6, as a function of the distance from the surface of the hot deformed bar, showed a higher difference for the middle zone where, due to the larger difference in the strain and cooling rate, the spacing was expected to increase. However, Figure 3 shows that the variation in hardness was larger in the upper zone, which means that lamellar spacing is not the only factor to determine the mechanical properties and that PAGS is also important [12]. It is also important that the 95% confidence interval at the center of the bar was large for both zones, as this is a zone where the cooling rate is lower and the effect of strain in lamellar spacing is stronger.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Grain growth models (steels with Ti and Nb), which consider the previous austenite grain size (PAGS), indicate that between 950 and 1200 • C, small precipitates (~300 nm) may form [11]. Moreover, austenitizing treatments promote the M 23 C 6 to M 7 C 3 transformation in Cr-Mo-V steels, and the packet size of martensite is linearly related to PAGS with trip-like M 23 C 6 precipitate at the martensite lathe boundaries [12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Many researches have shown that coarse precipitates tend to decrease the impact toughness of steels. [ 26,27 ] Previously presented TEM investigation showed that NbC precipitates existed in the matrix of Mo–Nb steel.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%