2015
DOI: 10.5307/jbe.2015.40.3.224
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Microwave Heat Treatment on Inhibition of Corn Seed Germination

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For each category, 800 kernels were acquired with 400 seeds used as the different-year sample and the other 400 seeds used as the aged sample for comparison. Artificial aging of seeds was induced in the rice simples using microwave heat treatment at 700 W input power and 60 s exposure time, which was optimized in advance for this experiment in accordance with the study by Ambrose et al [35].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For each category, 800 kernels were acquired with 400 seeds used as the different-year sample and the other 400 seeds used as the aged sample for comparison. Artificial aging of seeds was induced in the rice simples using microwave heat treatment at 700 W input power and 60 s exposure time, which was optimized in advance for this experiment in accordance with the study by Ambrose et al [35].…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies have considered the potential of microwave radiation to control invasive and pest species for commercial, agricultural, or ecological purposes, in particular in the interest of developing nonchemical techniques (Ambrose et al 2015; Barker and Craker 1991; Fleming et al 2005; Sahin and Saglam 2015). Microwave radiation causes dielectric heating of moist materials and offers a means of rapidly reaching the temperature needed for loss of seed viability and inhibition of germination (in a 60 to 90 C range, depending on the authors; Barker and Craker 1991; Bebawi et al 2007; Brodie et al 2007b; Mavrogianopoulos et al 2000; Sahin 2014) and can be considered as a thermal weed control method that has no direct environmental drawbacks, especially as there is no residue to contaminate the surroundings, unlike herbicides.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%