2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2015.10.082
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of mixing on the performance of wet steam ejectors

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the default wet steam model was less satisfactory to predict the condensation process because their comparison results presented that the CFD model predicted a very earlier Wilson point than experimental data. Ariafar et al [39] also solved the non-equilibrium condensation in a steam ejector using the ANSYS FLUENT. Their numerical results showed that the entrainment ratio and critical back pressure calculated by the wet steam model were 10% and 7% higher than that for the ideal gas law, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the default wet steam model was less satisfactory to predict the condensation process because their comparison results presented that the CFD model predicted a very earlier Wilson point than experimental data. Ariafar et al [39] also solved the non-equilibrium condensation in a steam ejector using the ANSYS FLUENT. Their numerical results showed that the entrainment ratio and critical back pressure calculated by the wet steam model were 10% and 7% higher than that for the ideal gas law, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wet steam model can better predict the actual flow conditions and the simulation results are closer to the experimental values [46,47]. Nevertheless, the research of comparing the CFD simulation values with the experimental values studied by Moore et al [48], it was concluded that the simulated value of the ideal gas model is closer to the experimental value and can better reflect the fluid flow characteristics than the wet steam model in the double-choked flow mode. Garcia del Valle [38] pointed out that there was no significant difference between the ideal gas and the real gas in the linear axisymmetric supersonic ejector.…”
Section: Numerical Simulation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 83%
“…where ρ, u i , p, T and H are the density, velocity, pressure, temperature and total enthalpy, respectively. λ eff is the effective conductivity, purpose, the shear stress transport (SST) k-ω turbulence model is used due to the good accuracy to predict the supersonic nozzle flow [39] and the condensation phenomenon [40]. The equations for these turbulence models are not documented here for brevity, however, they are well documented by Menter [41].…”
Section: Conservation Equations For Gas-liquid Mixturementioning
confidence: 99%