1972
DOI: 10.1016/0032-3861(72)90062-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of molecular weight on the rate of crystallization of polyethylene fractions at high undercooling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Spherulite growth rate measurement and its variation with molecular weight follow the pattern of growth rate against log molecular weight and the half‐life of crystallization plots, as discussed in the previous section. This observation is similar to those already reported for other polymeric systems by Barrels et al12–16 and thus is not discussed further herein.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Spherulite growth rate measurement and its variation with molecular weight follow the pattern of growth rate against log molecular weight and the half‐life of crystallization plots, as discussed in the previous section. This observation is similar to those already reported for other polymeric systems by Barrels et al12–16 and thus is not discussed further herein.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This represents a primary process of spherulitic growth for which n = 3 and a secondary process of annealing or interlamella growth occurs with n values between 1.0 and 1.8 11, 12. An Avrami value of 1.8 is characteristic of a crystallization process with one‐dimensional growth, linear growth, and heterogeneous nucleation 13, 14. This suggests that molecular weight fractionation or rejection in broad distribution samples and impurity segregation in low stereoregular samples could result in low n values.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is worthy to noticing that when the branches content is higher than 12%, L and Lc remains essentially unchanged. For copolymers with low comonomer contents, the backbone chain length between branches is an important parameter which has a great influence on crystallization [34][35][36]. In the case of the copolymers with large amount of octene branches, the influence of chain length on crystallization is likely to be weak because the increased friction which reduced mobility and the flexibility of sequences for crystallization has reached a maximum to a certain degree.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In reality, the relationship between the surface free energy (σ e , proportional to ΔG*) of crystals and the molecular weight has been well established. 33 In most cases, the σ e is reported to increase with the increase in molecular weight of polymers. 38 A transition of chain morphology in crystallites from extended state to folded state can be observed with the increase in the molecular weight.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…31 The nature of the nucleation efficiency is related to the free energy for a stable nucleus formation (ΔG*) and the energy of transport term (E D ) in the solid−liquid interface. 33 Therefore, the influence of molecular weight on the crystallization rate can be actually interpreted as the effect of molecular weight on ΔG* and E D . In reality, the relationship between the surface free energy (σ e , proportional to ΔG*) of crystals and the molecular weight has been well established.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%