1963
DOI: 10.1038/200273b0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Neonatal Thymectomy, Bursectomy and Thymo-bursectomy on Hæmagglutinin Production in Chickens

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1963
1963
1976
1976

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been shown by several workers (6)(7)(8)(9)13) that the presence of the bursa in the first few weeks of postembryonic life is essential for the evolution of antibody forming potential in the chicken. In addition, we have demonstrated recently (13) that the impaired antibody res ponse of bursaless chickens can be almost completely restored by bursal homografts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been shown by several workers (6)(7)(8)(9)13) that the presence of the bursa in the first few weeks of postembryonic life is essential for the evolution of antibody forming potential in the chicken. In addition, we have demonstrated recently (13) that the impaired antibody res ponse of bursaless chickens can be almost completely restored by bursal homografts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It seems, however, that burscctomy at hatching does not influence delayed hypersensitive responses (10,11). On the other hand, neonatal thymectomy in chickens, as in mammals, con siderably retards the rejection of skin homografts (12), despite nor mal antibody forming capacity (13). It is, therefore, quite possible that in birds bursa and thymus share roles in the ontogenesis of im mune function (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite the wide variation in the levels of circulating in~munoglobulins of surgically bursectomized chicks, these birds have consistently demonstrated deficient primary humoral immune responses but normal secondary responses (Glick et al 1956;Mueller et al 1960;Warner et al 1962;Isakovic et al 1963;Claflin et al 1966;Cooper et al 1966;Cooper er al. 1969;Lerner et al 1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The effect of thymectomy on the antibody response of the chicken is subject to some controversy. Thym ectomy alone did not impair the antibody response to human gamma globulin [5] and erythrocytes [26] and impaired the response to bovine serum albumin in only a small fraction (6 %) of the animals [22], C o o per et al [15] reported that a significant proportion of thymectomized-irradiated chickens were unable to produce antibodies against Brucella abortus antigen and bovine serum albumin, but no significant difference was noted between the group means.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%