2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0038-1101(99)00171-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of nonlinear physical phenomena on the photovoltaic effect in silicon p+–n–n+ solar cells

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A detailed understanding of the factors that govern the motion of mobile charge carriers through nanostructures is critical to the rational design of nanoscale devices. Understanding carrier motion is particularly important for nanowires (NWs) encoded with p-n junctions, which have been widely explored for use in photovoltaic devices based on a range of materials including Si, InP, GaAs, , and CdS. , Because of the inherently small dimensions, many nanoelectronic components operate at high carrier concentrations resulting from heavy doping or high injection conditions. In this regime, carrier–carrier interactions and other many body effects (e.g., dopant/carrier interactions, electron screening, and electron–hole scattering) must be considered. Charge carrier dynamics in nanostructures are further complicated by unintentional electric fields created through surface charging , or ionized defects. Under conditions of high carrier density and short length scales, our understanding of charge carrier flow through nanostructures draws heavily on experimental observations coupled with sophisticated simulations.…”
Section: Nanowire Junctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A detailed understanding of the factors that govern the motion of mobile charge carriers through nanostructures is critical to the rational design of nanoscale devices. Understanding carrier motion is particularly important for nanowires (NWs) encoded with p-n junctions, which have been widely explored for use in photovoltaic devices based on a range of materials including Si, InP, GaAs, , and CdS. , Because of the inherently small dimensions, many nanoelectronic components operate at high carrier concentrations resulting from heavy doping or high injection conditions. In this regime, carrier–carrier interactions and other many body effects (e.g., dopant/carrier interactions, electron screening, and electron–hole scattering) must be considered. Charge carrier dynamics in nanostructures are further complicated by unintentional electric fields created through surface charging , or ionized defects. Under conditions of high carrier density and short length scales, our understanding of charge carrier flow through nanostructures draws heavily on experimental observations coupled with sophisticated simulations.…”
Section: Nanowire Junctionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is exemplified by the highly nonlinear density response of silicon based solar cells, where electronhole scattering can play a significant role in device operation, especially under strong illumination conditions. 2 This work is part of the research program of the "Stichting voor Fundamenteel Onderzoek der Materie ͑FOM͒," which is financially supported by the "Nederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek ͑NWO͒." We are grateful to H. G. Muller for helpful discussions.…”
Section: Using 17mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Carrier-carrier collisions, for instance, can strongly affect the conductivity, and the decrease of electron and hole drift mobilities with increasing charge carrier densities is an important factor in determining the current-voltage characteristics of, for example, semiconductor diodes at increased current densities 1 and solar cells under strong illumination conditions. 2 Charge mobility depends on two quantities: its effective mass and scattering time ͑i.e., the average time in-between momentum-randomizing events, due to, e.g., electronphonon scattering͒. Theory has indicated that both of these quantities can be strongly dependent on the free charge density in semiconductors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where j sn and j sp are the saturation currents of the p + -n and n + -n junctions, respectively. Taking into account the bandgap narrowing at a high doping level, Auger recombination and EHS in the emitters, the expression for the effective saturation current j s can be written as [7]…”
Section: The Statement Of the Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%