Effect of normal load on abrasive wear resistance and wear micromechanisms in FeMnAlC alloy and other austenitic steels

Zambrano, O.A.; Aguilar, Y.; Valdés, Jairo; Rodríguez, S.A.; Coronado, J.J.

doi:10.1016/j.wear.2015.11.019

Cited by 62 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 32 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Investigation into the wear resistance of ferrous alloys is still an important problem; consequently, many authors research into the sliding [7,8], abrasion [2,9], erosion [10,11], corrosion [12][13][14] or cavitation erosion [8,15] wear resistance of commercial steels such as S235, S355, C45, AISI 304 and Hardox 500. However, the information about the steel wear properties examined for a wider group of commercial materials is limited.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…For example, Zambrano et al [16] investigated the sliding wear resistance of selected steels (AISI 5160, AISI 1045 and AISI O1). However, the tested group of materials presents the same hardness or in another work [9] investigated and compared the abrasive resistance of only the austenitic steel group (grades FeMnAlC steel, AISI 316L and Hadfield steel). Therefore, it is necessary to combine the results for a broader range of materials.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Abrasion Resistance of S235, S355, C45, AISI 304 and Hardox 500 Steels with Usage of Garnet, Corundum and Carborundum Abrasives

Szala¹,

Szafran²,

Macek³

et al. 2019

Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The steel presents a wide field of application. The abrasive wear resistance of steel relies mainly on the microstructure, hardness as well as on the abrasive material properties. Moreover, the selection of a abrasion-resistant grade of steel still seems to be a crucial and unsolved problem, especially due to the fact that the actual operating conditions can be affected by the presence of different abrasive materials. The aim of this work was to determine the effect of different abrasive grit materials i.e. garnet, corundum and carborundum on the abrasive wear result of a commonly used in industry practice steels i.e. S235, S355, C45, AISI 304 and Hardox 500. The microstructure of the steel was investigated using light optical microscopy. Moreover, hardness was measured with Vickers hardness tester. Additionally, the size and morphology of the abrasive materials were characterized. The abrasion tests were conducted with the usage of T-07 tribotester (dry sand rubber wheel). The results demonstrate that the hardness and structure of steels and hardness of abrasive grids influenced the wear results. The abrasive wear behavior of steels was dominated by microscratching and microcutting wear mechanisms. The highest mass loss was obtained for garnet, corundum, and carborundum, respectively. The usage of various abrasives results in different abrasion resistance for each tested steel grade. The AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel presents an outstanding abrasive wear resistance while usage of corundum and Hardox 500 while using a garnet as abrasive material. The C45 carbon steel was less resistant than AISI 304 for all three examined abrasives. The lowest resistance to wear in garnet and carborundum was obtained for the S235JR and S355J2 ferritic-perlitic carbon steels and in corundum for Hardox 500 which has tempered martensitic structure.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Abrasion Resistance of S235, S355, C45, AISI 304 and Hardox 500 Steels with Usage of Garnet, Corundum and Carborundum Abrasives

Szala¹,

Szafran²,

Macek³

et al. 2019

Adv. Sci. Technol. Res. J.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One of the last published works related to the abrasion of these steels was carried out by Zambrano et al (2016) [245], who studied the role of stacking fault energy (SFE) in the twobody abrasive wear of austenitic steels. Using a pin-abrasion test with 220 grit garnet paper as the counterbody, and three austenitic steels with different SFE were compared.…”

Section: Abrasive Wearmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The effect of the normal load on the wear resistance for the FeMnAlC steel, Hadfield steel, and AISI 316L steel (the bars correspond to the interval of confidence at 95%), reproduced from[245] with permission of Elsevier ® To end this section about the abrasive wear of Fe-Mn-Al-C steels, it is important to name that some recent results showed a better wear resistance of Fe-Mn-Al-C alloys in comparison with conventional Hadfield steels[246]. Actually, this year was patented a series of Fe-Mn-Al-C alloys with improved wear resistance and impact toughness[247].…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

A general perspective of Fe–Mn–Al–C steels

Zambrano

2018

J Mater Sci

181

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

During the last years, the scientific and industrial community have focused on the astonishing properties of Fe-Mn-Al-C steels. These high advanced steels allow high-density reductions about ~18% lighter than conventional steels, high corrosion resistance, high strength (ultimate tensile strength (UTS) ~1 Gpa) and at the same time ductility above 60%.The increase of the tensile or yield strength and the ductility at the same time is almost a special feature of this kind of new steels, which makes them so interesting for many applications such as in the automotive, armor and mining industry. The control of these properties depends on a complex relationship between the chemical composition of the steel, the test temperature, the external loads and the processing parameters of the steel. This review has been conceived to tried to elucidate these complex relations and gather the most important aspects of Fe-Mn-Al-C steels developed so far.

show abstract

“…The principal reasons why the surface of steel benefits from nitriding, are the fact that wear and friction properties are improved by structure and microstructure modification, especially via a hardness increase due to the formation of an interstitial solid solution or compound layer [11] [12] [13] [14]. The parameters governing the wear resistance are multiply depending on relative speed, contact pressure, lubricant, and properties of the material itself (hardness surface and residual stress) [15] [16] [17] [18] [19].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of the Effect of Gas Nitriding Time on Microstructure and Wear Resistance of 42CrMo4 Steel

Terres¹,

Ammari²,

Cherif³

2017

MSA

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Prior studies have noted that gas nitriding has a considerable effect for wear resistance. The aim of this paper is to study the influence of gas nitriding time (12, 24, 36 and 48 h) in the wear behaviour of 42CrMo4 steel. It has been assessed by micro hardness, pin-on-disc tribosystem, and SEM through the nitrided layer for each nitriding time. The study relates to the performance of the compound layer and the diffusion layer with respect to adhesive wear. The results were analyzed in terms of the weight lost during wear, for nitrided steel with and without the compound layer, and for untreated steel. It has been observed that wear rate varies as a function of the tests conditions due to the presence of different wear mechanisms. Thus, for short tests conditions wear rate depends on two mechanisms: plastic deformation and adhesive wear, whereas for large tests conditions the mechanisms controlling wear rate are abrasive and oxidative wear. Furthermore, this study contains an analysis of the wear mechanisms of a nitrided part, founded on scanning electron microscopy (SEM) observations of the wear traces at various stages of the evolution of wear. The SEM examination of worn surfaces revealed signatures for the adhesion, abrasion, delamination and tribochemical (oxidative) modes of wear. This is an important issue for future research.

show abstract

Effect of normal load on abrasive wear resistance and wear micromechanisms in FeMnAlC alloy and other austenitic steels

Cited by 62 publications

References 32 publications

Abrasion Resistance of S235, S355, C45, AISI 304 and Hardox 500 Steels with Usage of Garnet, Corundum and Carborundum Abrasives

Abrasion Resistance of S235, S355, C45, AISI 304 and Hardox 500 Steels with Usage of Garnet, Corundum and Carborundum Abrasives

A general perspective of Fe–Mn–Al–C steels

Study of the Effect of Gas Nitriding Time on Microstructure and Wear Resistance of 42CrMo4 Steel

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About