Effect of nozzle diameter on mechanical and geometric performance of 3D printed carbon fibre-reinforced composites manufactured by fused filament fabrication

Abstract

Purpose Fused filament fabrication (FFF) is one of the most popular additive manufacturing (AM) technologies due to its ability to build thermoplastic parts with complex geometries at low cost. The FFF technique has been mainly used for rapid prototyping owing to the poor mechanical and geometrical properties of pure thermoplastic parts. However, both the development of new fibre-reinforced filaments with improved mechanical properties, and more accurate composite 3D printers have broadened the scope of FFF applications to functional components. FFF is a complex process with a large number of parameters influencing product quality and mechanical properties, and the effects of the combined parameters are usually difficult to evaluate. An array of parameter combinations has been analysed for improving the mechanical performance of thermoplastic parts such as layer thickness, build orientation, raster angle, raster width, air gap, infill density and pattern, fibre volume fraction, fibre layer location, fibre orientation and feed rate. This study aims to assess the effects of nozzle diameter on the mechanical performance and the geometric properties of 3D printed short carbon fibre-reinforced composites processed by the FFF technique. Design methodology approach Tensile and three-point bending tests were performed to characterise the mechanical response of the 3D printed composite samples. The dimensional accuracy, the flatness error and surface roughness of the printed specimens were also evaluated. Moreover, manufacturing costs, which are related to printing time, were evaluated. Finally, scanning electron microscopy images of the printed samples were analysed to estimate the porosity as a function of the nozzle diameter and to justify the effect of nozzle diameter on dimensional accuracy and surface roughness. Findings The effect of nozzle diameter on the mechanical and geometric quality of 3D printed composite samples was significant. In addition, large nozzle diameters tended to increase mechanical performance and enhance surface roughness, with a reduction in manufacturing costs. In contrast, 3D printed composite samples with small nozzle diameter exhibited higher geometric accuracy. However, the effect of nozzle diameter on the flatness error and surface roughness was of slight significance. Finally, some print guidelines are included. Originality value The effect of nozzle diameter, which is directly related to product quality and manufacturing costs, has not been extensively studied. The presented study provides more information regarding the dependence of the mechanical, microstructural and geometric properties of short carbon fibre-reinforced nylon composite components on nozzle diameter.

Effects of fused filament fabrication parameters on the manufacturing of 316L stainless-steel components: geometric and mechanical properties

“…A large amount of polymer between layers can be observed, which was a product of the coated layer of the filament. The microstructure obtained was similar to that observed in standard FFF-based specimens (Chacón et al , 2017; Caminero et al , 2019; Chacón et al , 2021). In addition, some pores and voids due to the extrusion process in FFF technologies, without any compaction stage between deposited strands and between layers are visible in Figure 6(b).…”

“…Two different nozzle diameters were assessed ∅ N = 0.4 and 0.6 mm, respectively. The use of a nozzle diameter less than 0.4 mm is not recommended, as an increase in the pressure drop along the nozzle can be expected (Chacón et al , 2021; Papon et al , 2017). The corresponding effective deposited line width L w associated with the previous nozzle diameters were L w = 0.35 and 0.53 mm, respectively.…”

Rapid consolidation of 3D printed composite parts using compression moulding for improved thermo mechanical properties

“…Furthermore, the post-consolidation approach will facilitate the improvement in mechanical strength along with highly anisotropic material behaviour. As an alternative, the proposed methodology may be applied to realise faster serial production of complex parts at higher throughput (Chacón et al , 2021), while maintaining strength similar to the parts produced via relatively expensive and design intensive IM.…”

Influence of process parameters on mechanical strength, build time, and material consumption of3Dprinted polylactic acid parts

“…Larger nozzle diameter causes high rate of material extrusion that ultimately leads to high printing speed which causes poor surface quality. [8,25,26] Large nozzle diameter in turn results in a smaller number of sliced layers, thus, the width and thickness of layers increases, resulting in poor surface quality and lack of dimensional accuracy. The build time, layer height, and air gap are affected by nozzle diameter.…”