1954
DOI: 10.1037/h0062018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of number of choices per unit of a verbal maze on learning and serial position errors.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

1957
1957
1968
1968

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…investigated the effect of doublet location within the verbal maze pattern on its acquisition and the form of the serial position error curves. The 16-unit 4-choice pattern of Brogden and Schmidt (1954) was modified by locating doublets (two successive like responses) at Units 2 and 3, 5 and 6, 8 and 9, 11 and 12, and 14 and 15, respectively, for the five experimental groups. The serial position curves of the difference in errors between each experimental group and the control group show a doublet effect of a significant increase in errors for the second item.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…investigated the effect of doublet location within the verbal maze pattern on its acquisition and the form of the serial position error curves. The 16-unit 4-choice pattern of Brogden and Schmidt (1954) was modified by locating doublets (two successive like responses) at Units 2 and 3, 5 and 6, 8 and 9, 11 and 12, and 14 and 15, respectively, for the five experimental groups. The serial position curves of the difference in errors between each experimental group and the control group show a doublet effect of a significant increase in errors for the second item.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is, however, no reason why the recognition and correction techniques could not be applied in the context of a task in which the occurrence of associative learning is clear. This has already been done with a serial learning procedure by Brogden andSchmidt (1954a, 1954b). Riley (1952) has used sets of response alternatives in a paired-associates task, and although he allowed only one response to each stimulus, his technique could readily be extended to employ repeated guessing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The third variable which may determine the magnitude of S-R similarity effects is the predictability of 107 the repeated element(s). Several experiments (e.g., Brogden & Schmidt, 1954) have shown that task difficulty increases as the degree of response uncertainty increases. In the case of intrapair S-R similarity, response uncertainty is determined, in part, by the predictability of the location in the stimulus and response terms of the repeated element (s).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%