The 26th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society
DOI: 10.1109/iembs.2004.1404220
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of ocular artifact removal in brain computer interface accuracy

Abstract: We report the effect of removing ocular artifacts on the performance of a word-processing application based on the event related potential P300. Various methods of removing artifacts have been reported. The efficiency of these algorithms are usually done by subjective visual comparisons. Noting that there is a direct correlation of artifact rectifying algorithms to the accuracy in a brain computer interface system's accuracy, we present this work as a means to compare different algorithms.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Upcoming consumer application based on EEG such as brain-computer interface [1] or biofeedback devices [2] are mostly intended for non-clinical, everyday home use. Simplicity of use and low price are essential for those devices.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Upcoming consumer application based on EEG such as brain-computer interface [1] or biofeedback devices [2] are mostly intended for non-clinical, everyday home use. Simplicity of use and low price are essential for those devices.…”
Section: Problem Descriptionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, more sophisticated methods such as principal component analysis (PCA) and independent component analysis (ICA) are popular to reduce ECG and EMG noises that have overlapping spectral information with EEG. Another common artifact that corrupts EEG signals is eye blinks; many techniques have been proposed to solve this problem (Thulasidas et al, 2004).…”
Section: Pre-processingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, EEG measures are always contaminated by non-cerebral signals, which may disturb the interpretation of the brain activity. This issue has become a recurrent problem, for example in Brain-Computer Interfaces (BCI), where it has been proved to decrease classification error rates [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%