2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.scienta.2008.12.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of partial rootzone drying on growth, gas exchange, and yield of tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

4
10
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
4
10
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar WUE trend in the two systems was reported by Acatrinei (2010). The results obtained in the conventional system are also in accordance with WUE values reported by Lovelli et al (2012) and Campos et al (2009). Table 6 separately reports fruit and total dry weight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A similar WUE trend in the two systems was reported by Acatrinei (2010). The results obtained in the conventional system are also in accordance with WUE values reported by Lovelli et al (2012) and Campos et al (2009). Table 6 separately reports fruit and total dry weight.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…1a and b in the last part of crop cycle), tried to increase the uptake of mineral nutrients from the soil through higher transpiration. Acatrinei (2010) and Karanatsidis and Berova (2009) reported a similar E trend, while different E values have been reported for tomato cultivated only in conventional systems (Campos et al, 2009;Cantore et al, 2009;Lovelli et al, 2012;Ozbahce and Tari, 2010;Patanè, 2011). However, some of these authors worked in greenhouse conditions, and Ozbahce and Tari (2010) in semi-arid conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Previous reports have confirmed higher soluble solid values in tomato fruit grown under PRD [49,50]. However, Campos et al [51] found no difference in soluble solids values between PRD and control fruits. It is presumed that the higher soluble solids values were due to higher rates of conversion of starch into sugars [53] and lower fruit water contents under water deficit [54].…”
Section: Physiological Quantitative and Qualitative Parametersmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…The lower g s values and the higher marketable yield showed by IR 70PRD compared to IR 70DI allowed us to suppose that the stomata closing under the PRD regime do not significantly affect the photosynthesis rate, resulting in the WUE increase. Studies on tomatoes grown in greenhouses [50,51] have shown that photosynthesis under the PRD condition is not reduced compared to fully-irrigated plants. In our experimental conditions, which were open field conditions, the PRD determined a decrease in g s values and an increase in marketable yield, and WUE let us suppose that there was no limiting in photosynthesis rate.…”
Section: Physiological Quantitative and Qualitative Parametersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was no reduction in the net photosynthetic rate due to PRD treatment in cotton (Du et al 2006), sweet pepper , corn (Du et al 2010), grapes (Du et al 2008), potato (Liu et al 2008), tomato (Campos et al 2009) and apple (Zegbe and Behboudian 2008), when compared with the treatment where the rootzone was irrigated to field capacity (FI). However, other studies have shown that plants under PRD conditions present lower A values compared to plants cultivated in the FI treatment (Liu et al 2006;Kirda et al 2005, Yuan et al 2013.…”
mentioning
confidence: 93%