2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.07.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pattern size and geometry on the use of Cassie–Baxter equation for superhydrophobic surfaces

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
78
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 98 publications
(83 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
4
78
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There was no significant difference in CA values between PA-g-PMMA 164 -Br and PA-g-PS 66 -Br because of the nature of the grafted polymer. Although the contact angles values were not correlated with the local texture of the fabric, the dramatic differences between unmodified and modified fibers confirm the polymer growth on the fibers' surfaces [39][40][41]. and the contact angles dramatically increased to 118° and 115°, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…There was no significant difference in CA values between PA-g-PMMA 164 -Br and PA-g-PS 66 -Br because of the nature of the grafted polymer. Although the contact angles values were not correlated with the local texture of the fabric, the dramatic differences between unmodified and modified fibers confirm the polymer growth on the fibers' surfaces [39][40][41]. and the contact angles dramatically increased to 118° and 115°, respectively.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 81%
“…If they changed only the value of b the water contact angle would increase for the microstuctured surface with increasing b value but for the hierarchical structured surface, the change in the contact angle value is negligible and there is no tell-dependency. Cansoy et al [54] measured water contact angles on surfaces with two types of pillars: square and cylindrical. The pillar separation distance, s, changed from 20 to 40 m and the advancing contact angle changed slightly as a function of s but independent of the pillar shape.…”
Section: Surface Roughness Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As usual, the Cassie -Baxter mode [29,30] is employed here in an attempt to understand the large increase of the hydrophobicity on patterned surfaces with pillars and dimples ( figure 3). From a previous study [18], the wettability of a surface decorated with large, simple micropatterns was commonly configured in the transition from the Wenzel to Cassie -Baxter mode.…”
Section: Pillars Dimples For Scale-dependent Wettabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%