1999
DOI: 10.1149/1.1391010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of pH and Ionic Strength on Chemical Mechanical Polishing of Tantalum

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Adding 0.25 wt% K 2 SO 4 , the oxide RRs increased throughout the pH range, presumably due to the increase in ionic strength. Several studies [19][20][21][22][23] have already shown that increasing the ionic strength increases oxide RRs due to the reduction in the electrostatic repulsion, an argument also supported by the potential data for the silica dispersions (later shown in Fig. 4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Adding 0.25 wt% K 2 SO 4 , the oxide RRs increased throughout the pH range, presumably due to the increase in ionic strength. Several studies [19][20][21][22][23] have already shown that increasing the ionic strength increases oxide RRs due to the reduction in the electrostatic repulsion, an argument also supported by the potential data for the silica dispersions (later shown in Fig. 4).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Studies of surfactant adsorption have typically focused on conditions where there is clear electrostatic driving force for adsorption; i.e., where surfactants have opposite charge to those of metal oxide surfaces [22]. Ramarajan et al demonstrated CMP with high ionic strength slurries at high pH due to the reduction of electrostatic repulsion force [23]. The effects of alkaline ionic salts (KCl, LiCl and NaCl) on SiO 2 CMP using 500 nm diameter abrasive silica particles are reported by Choi et al [24].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The electrical double-layer (DL) forces between the wafer and the abrasive particles depend on the zeta potentials of both the wafer and particles, and were shown to have a strong influence on the MRR. 35,[44][45][46][47] When the DL forces are attractive, the contact force between the wafer and abrasives becomes large, which causes the MRR for each abrasive particle to increase. 29,47 The experimentally observed variation in MRR with a slurry pH was attributed to the effect of a slurry pH on the zeta potential, which influences the magnitude of DL forces.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%