1994
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.33.6785
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Phase Error on Lithographic Characteristics Using Attenuated Phase-Shifting Mask

Abstract: An attenuated phase-shifting mask is one of the most useful technologies for sub-half-micron lithography. However, it is necessary to control new parameters such as phase or transmittance when a phase-shifting mask is applied to practical use. We investigated the effect of phase error on lithographic characteristics for a hole pattern using an attenuated phase shifting mask. It is found that a phase error causes a decrease of depth of focus (DOF) and shift of best focus position. It is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It has been pointed out that the phase-shifting effect will be degraded if the mask has a phase error [7]. The reason can be explained as follows.…”
Section: Thin Absorber Phase-shifting Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It has been pointed out that the phase-shifting effect will be degraded if the mask has a phase error [7]. The reason can be explained as follows.…”
Section: Thin Absorber Phase-shifting Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is well known that the best focus position of an optical EPSM shifts when the mask has a phase error [7]. This is the reason why the spec of the optical EPSM phase uniformity is very tight (3degrrees in range [8]).…”
Section: Best Focus Position Shiftmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The aerial image generated by NFPSCL was suggested to be due to a combination of near-field and phase-shifting effects [4]. But features are resolved uniformly throughout photoresist layers of thicknesses far in excess of the exposure wavelength, which means that the dominance of near-field effects is doubtful and may even be absent [9]- [11]. In contrast, a recent experimental investigation on broadband ultraviolet (UV) lithography disclosed the high sensitivity of the feature resolution to the phase shifts built into the phase mask [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Small phase errors are unacceptable in an AES mask, because they decrease the depth of focus and shift the optimum focus position. 11 Phase errors are caused by poor etch selectivity 8 with respect to the substrate, and more consequentially by difficulty in controlling the film's chemical composition. 6 Furthermore, the material's requirements for a partially transmitting phase shift mask are seemingly contradictory.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%