1998
DOI: 10.5713/ajas.1998.559
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Phase Feeding on the Growth Performance and Nutrient Utilization in Finishing Pigs

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
6
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Likewise, TBARS, drip loss and CIE color score (L*, a* and b*) of loins at different storage intervals also did not differ among the treatments. These findings agree with those of Han et al (1998), who also did not notice any differences in the carcass characteristics of pigs under different phase feeding regimens. However, two phase feeding system was reported to significantly reduce the backfat thickness than three phase feeding system (Ko et al, 2004), whereas, Lee et 3) Scored on the scale of 1 = practically devoid to 5 = very firm and dark (NPPC, 1991).…”
Section: Carcass Characteristics and Pork Quality Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Likewise, TBARS, drip loss and CIE color score (L*, a* and b*) of loins at different storage intervals also did not differ among the treatments. These findings agree with those of Han et al (1998), who also did not notice any differences in the carcass characteristics of pigs under different phase feeding regimens. However, two phase feeding system was reported to significantly reduce the backfat thickness than three phase feeding system (Ko et al, 2004), whereas, Lee et 3) Scored on the scale of 1 = practically devoid to 5 = very firm and dark (NPPC, 1991).…”
Section: Carcass Characteristics and Pork Quality Evaluationsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…The results of our study demonstrate that the MP level (19.45-17.50-13.87%) during grower-finisher I-finisher II phases, respectively, is optimum for growing-finishing pigs. Moreover, diets with CP in excess of 14% for late finishing pigs did not show any improvements in growth rate (Han et al, 1998). Also previous reports have proved that pigs do not have the ability to control protein intake to meet their requirements (Owen et al, 1994;Nam and Aherne, 1995), and consumption of protein above requirement leads to wastage as the animal is unable to convert dietary amino acids to body protein (Chen et al, 1996).…”
Section: Growth Performancementioning
confidence: 97%
“…Phase feeding Phase feeding is the most studied feeding strategy, when aiming to decrease nutrient excretion (Lenis, 1989;Coppoolse et al, 1990;Henry and Dourmad, 1993;Han et al, 1998;Lee et al, 2000;Brossard et al, 2009; Table 5 The total, soluble and insoluble cumulative P excreted by a population of 500 pigs treated according to a 'sorting plan': the pigs were either treated as a single population, (no sorting), or the lightest 10%, 20% and 30% of the population were fed a higher digestible P in comparison with the remaining population The supply of dietary digestible P (g/kg) was determined to meet the average digestible P requirements of the sorted and remaining population at the mid-point BW of each feeding phase. Table 4 The effect of phase feeding (one, two or three phases) on the performance of a population of pigs from 30 to 120 kg in terms of: (1) average daily gain (ADG) (kg/day); (2) protein (Pr) retained (g/day); (3) phosphorus (P) retained (g/day) and (4) The supply of dietary digestible P targeted the digestible P requirements of the average of the population at the mid-point BW (1/2 target), or the mean BW of the first third of each feeding sequence plan (1/3 target).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nam and Aherne (1995) reported that there was a decreasing tendency in back fat thickness and an increasing tendency in carcass dressing percentage (P<0.05) in those pigs reared in three phase feeding regimen (18-16-14% CP for growing-finishing period), in comparison with those pigs fed in one phase feeding regimen (16% CP for growingfinishing period). Han et al (1998) investigated the effect of phase feeding on carcass characteristics of finishing pigs and reported that backfat thickness of lighter pigs averaging 104kg of slaughter weight fed low nutrient density diets was significantly reduced (Table 7). Recently, Lee et al (1999) reported that the tenth rib fat thickness of pigs fed on four phase feeding regimen was reduced and there was a trend that backfat thickness decreased as the number of phases increased.…”
Section: Effects Of Phase Feeding On Carcass Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently in series of studies on phase feeding regimen, Seoul National University investigated the possibility of application of phase feeding to reduce the crude protein intake of finishing pigs (Han et al, 1998). Table 3 summarizes the effect of different feeding regimen on the growth performance of finishing pigs.…”
Section: Effects Of Phase Feeding Regimen On Growth Performancementioning
confidence: 99%