1998
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1998.513.15
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Planting Density and Harvesting Method on Rose Flower Production

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For all variables, there was a predominant effect of the month of harvest, and a cultivar effect was found only for stem length ( Table 2). The results found in this study are in agreement with the results found in other studies, where increases were observed in the production of floral stems associated to the increase or stabilization of the physical characteristics of roses (KOOL, 1996;DAMBRE et al, 2000;HASSANEIN, 2010;ZANÃO JÚNIOR et al, 2014 Means followed by the same lowercase letter in the column do not differ by Tukey's range test (p<0,05). ns = not significant by ANOVA (p<0,05).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…For all variables, there was a predominant effect of the month of harvest, and a cultivar effect was found only for stem length ( Table 2). The results found in this study are in agreement with the results found in other studies, where increases were observed in the production of floral stems associated to the increase or stabilization of the physical characteristics of roses (KOOL, 1996;DAMBRE et al, 2000;HASSANEIN, 2010;ZANÃO JÚNIOR et al, 2014 Means followed by the same lowercase letter in the column do not differ by Tukey's range test (p<0,05). ns = not significant by ANOVA (p<0,05).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Similarly, the SAMs were as efficiently induced to flower and were able to differentiate normal and as many floral organs under blue light as under white light. Even though flower initiation is an autonomous process in Rosa (Bredmose & Hansen 1996), which does not require a specific light regime, it is well known that in this plant, unfavourable light conditions such as too low irradiance (Nell & Rasmussen 1979;Maas et al 1995b) can cause the arrest or abortion of flower buds, leading to blind shoots (Dambre et al 2000).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Planting density and harvesting methods in shoot-bending roses also greatly affected the cut flower productivity (Dambre et al, 2000;Kool and Lenssen, 1997). A high LAI (>3.5) in the bent shoot canopy might reduce the productivity because of mutual shading and a negative carbon balance within the canopy (Pien et al, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%