1999 4th International Symposium on Plasma Process-Induced Damage (IEEE Cat. No.99TH8395)
DOI: 10.1109/ppid.1999.798800
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of plasma density and uniformity, electron temperature, process gas, and chamber on electron shading damage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where k is the effective stressing factor that depends on device topography such as antenna aspect ratio. 12,15,50) The threshold voltage shift ÁV th by PCD is determined by the densities of the created trap sites and interface states. From a reliability test such as constant current stressing (CCS), threshold voltage shift is confirmed to be a function of the stress current density (I CCS ).…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…where k is the effective stressing factor that depends on device topography such as antenna aspect ratio. 12,15,50) The threshold voltage shift ÁV th by PCD is determined by the densities of the created trap sites and interface states. From a reliability test such as constant current stressing (CCS), threshold voltage shift is confirmed to be a function of the stress current density (I CCS ).…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that a similar power-law dependence of ÁV th on r was reported for SiO 2 gate dielectric. 50) The larger jÁV th j observed for the ICP exposure [Fig. 2(b)] is considered to be due to the higher plasma density for the ICP exposure than for the CCP exposure, resulting in a larger I stress .…”
Section: Appendix Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…32,33) From a plasma design point of view, plasma parameters such as plasma density and electron temperature, which determine electron and ion currents (J e and J i , in Fig. 1) and the directionality difference between electrons and ions, should be optimized 34) to reduce the damage. In this study, the antenna effects are focused.…”
Section: Plasma Charging Damagementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the operation of the ICP source with the dual frequencies of 2/13.56 Hz instead of the single frequency of 13.56 MHz is believed to decrease the possible damage to the sample during the plasma processing. [28][29][30][31] In large-scale substrate processing, one of the most important parameters is the plasma uniformity over the substrate surface. In this study, the plasma uniformity was also measured for the dual frequency operation using the Langmuir probe and the uniformity was compared with that for a single frequency of 13.56 MHz.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%