2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.joms.2004.07.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of platelet-rich plasma with autogenous bone graft for maxillary sinus augmentation in a rabbit model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
49
0
14

Year Published

2009
2009
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
49
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of these studies also use rabbits 5,25,26 . Aghaloo et al 5 show a very similar study to this presented here, with differences in the preparation of the PRP, in the monitoring periods (two, four and six weeks here and one, two and four months in theirs) and in the results when in the current study the PRP seemed to be harmful to the repair, these authors practically demonstrate neutral action of the PRP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of these studies also use rabbits 5,25,26 . Aghaloo et al 5 show a very similar study to this presented here, with differences in the preparation of the PRP, in the monitoring periods (two, four and six weeks here and one, two and four months in theirs) and in the results when in the current study the PRP seemed to be harmful to the repair, these authors practically demonstrate neutral action of the PRP.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even though clinical 4,20,21 and animal studies 8,22,23 reported the volume of PRP, they did not describe the volume of autogenous bone graft used. Therefore, the ratio of autogenous bone graft/PRP cannot be calculated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The amount of bone that can be created by these methods, however, is not sufficient for creating the 10-15 mm of bone necessary for implant stabilization [7]. Van Den Bergh et al (2000) in his study concluded that osteogenic protein-1 has the potential for initiating bone formation in maxillary sinus, so can be used instead of the gold standard autogenous bone [8]. Wheele et al (1997) in his study concluded that alloplastic material in sinus augmentation reduces the morbidity and expenses of the procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%