2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2019.03.028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effect of Pluronic F127 on porous and dense membrane structure formation via non-solvent induced and evaporation induced phase separation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An effective strategy for suppression of membrane fouling is to minimize attractive interactions between the membrane surface and components of the feed by chemical modification of the membrane surface which can be implemented by increasing membrane surface charge to promote electrostatic repulsion and hydrophilization to increase water-surface interaction [9,10]. The approaches utilized for the design of antifouling membranes involve (1) membrane polymer modification (pre-modification) [11], (2) blending of the membrane polymer with a modifying agent (additive) [12][13][14] and (3) surface modification after membrane preparation (post-modification) [15]. Grafting [5,7,[15][16][17][18][19][20] and coating [21,22] are the most important and frequently utilized membrane surface modification methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An effective strategy for suppression of membrane fouling is to minimize attractive interactions between the membrane surface and components of the feed by chemical modification of the membrane surface which can be implemented by increasing membrane surface charge to promote electrostatic repulsion and hydrophilization to increase water-surface interaction [9,10]. The approaches utilized for the design of antifouling membranes involve (1) membrane polymer modification (pre-modification) [11], (2) blending of the membrane polymer with a modifying agent (additive) [12][13][14] and (3) surface modification after membrane preparation (post-modification) [15]. Grafting [5,7,[15][16][17][18][19][20] and coating [21,22] are the most important and frequently utilized membrane surface modification methods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The macrovoids cause reduced resistance during the transfer of components through the membrane, resulting in increased permeation flux in the SA/PAN membrane ( Table 2 ). It is also worth noting that the cross-sectional structure of all substrates was uneven, which is attributed to the viscosity of the casting polymer solution and the preparation phase inversion method [ 61 , 62 ]. The UPM substrate had a compact skin top layer, where the thickest transition from a dense structure with small pores (a top layer of the substrate, on which dense SA layer was deposited) to a porous structure with large pores in the cross-section, was observed.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The permeability showed the following increasing trend: UPM < RC < PAN. The highest water permeability of the PAN substrate was attributed to increased porosity and surface roughness, the largest pore size of the skin top layer, and the hydrophilicity of the material [ 61 ]. Thus, the PAN substrate significantly improved transport properties of the developed supported membrane with a thin selective layer based on SA.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach promotes the formation of larger pore sizes and higher porosity. Pore precursors are ultimately removed from the scaffold by an appropriate solvent (porogen-leaching) [ 71 , 97 , 117 , 118 , 125 , 126 , 127 ]. Another similar method is solvent-casting particulate leaching (SCPL).…”
Section: Scaffold For Articular Cartilage Repair: Requirements Mamentioning
confidence: 99%